Skip to content

Add JMESPropertyWrapper protocol #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2021
Merged

Conversation

adam-fowler
Copy link
Collaborator

To aid Mirror parsing of property wrappers

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
marcoieni Marco Ieni
To aid Mirror parsing of property wrappers
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3 (9afac9e) into main (9095158) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #3      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.43%   94.44%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        1186     1189       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1120     1123       +3     
  Misses         66       66              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Sources/JMESPath/Expression.swift 68.18% <ø> (ø)
Sources/JMESPath/Lexer.swift 98.77% <ø> (ø)
Sources/JMESPath/Parser.swift 99.24% <ø> (ø)
Sources/JMESPath/Token.swift 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Sources/JMESPath/Variable.swift 93.51% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 64366a8...9afac9e. Read the comment docs.

@adam-fowler adam-fowler merged commit 4a166ea into main Jul 11, 2021
@adam-fowler adam-fowler deleted the jmes-property-wrapper branch July 11, 2021 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants