chore(test): fix parallel VM tests execution#2608
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldyrev <pavel@bpg.sh>
Summary of ChangesHello @bpg-dev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the reliability and efficiency of VM-related acceptance tests by addressing issues that arise during parallel execution. It centralizes the management of cloud image downloads and ensures that test resources, such as image files and cloud-init snippets, are uniquely named. These changes prevent resource conflicts and ensure consistent test outcomes when tests are run concurrently. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly improves the stability and reliability of the parallel acceptance tests. By centralizing the cloud image download, ensuring unique filenames for test artifacts, and correctly managing test concurrency, the changes effectively address potential race conditions and flakiness. The refactoring is clean and the addition of stop_on_destroy for running VMs is a good practice that further enhances test robustness. Overall, this is an excellent set of improvements to the test suite.
What does this PR do?
Contributor's Note
make lintand fixed any issues.make docs; SDK: manual/docs/edits).!in PR title).make exampleto verify the change works (mainly for SDK / provider config changes).Proof of Work
Community Note
Closes #0000 | Relates #0000