You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does it make sense to allow the end user to configure additional delay in RadioInterface::getTxDelayMsecWeighted for Role_CLIENT? Either by manually entering time in msec, or by selecting a new role such as Role_CLIENT_LATE, node would rebroadcast only if no other Role_ROUTER, Role_REPEATER or Role_CLIENT did.
The goal is to conserve energy for solar powered nodes by avoiding transmitting as much as possible, while at the same time providing last resort services to other nodes.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Does it make sense to allow the end user to configure additional delay in
RadioInterface::getTxDelayMsecWeightedforRole_CLIENT? Either by manually entering time in msec, or by selecting a new role such asRole_CLIENT_LATE, node would rebroadcast only if no otherRole_ROUTER,Role_REPEATERorRole_CLIENTdid.The goal is to conserve energy for solar powered nodes by avoiding transmitting as much as possible, while at the same time providing last resort services to other nodes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions