From f1f0734718b4413e22362ac31988259efb648311 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pierwill <pierwill@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:37:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix inaccurate function name in `rustc_const_eval` docs
---
compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs | 4 ++--
compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs
index a8a5ac2f9d95d..8926676e815f9 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/operand.rs
@@ -520,8 +520,8 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
Ok(OpTy { op, layout: place.layout })
}
- // Evaluate a place with the goal of reading from it. This lets us sometimes
- // avoid allocations.
+ /// Evaluate a place with the goal of reading from it. This lets us sometimes
+ /// avoid allocations.
pub fn eval_place_to_op(
&self,
place: mir::Place<'tcx>,
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs
index df6e05bb13cde..e23c6f2a95419 100644
--- a/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs
+++ b/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/place.rs
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ where
}
/// Computes a place. You should only use this if you intend to write into this
- /// place; for reading, a more efficient alternative is `eval_place_for_read`.
+ /// place; for reading, a more efficient alternative is `eval_place_to_op`.
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub fn eval_place(
&mut self,