|
| 1 | +// Copyright (C) 2025 Igalia, S.L. All rights reserved. |
| 2 | +// This code is governed by the BSD license found in the LICENSE file. |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +/*--- |
| 5 | +esid: sec-innermoduleevaluation |
| 6 | +description: > |
| 7 | + A module depending on an ~evaluated~ module that is part of a SCC that failed asynchronously |
| 8 | +info: | |
| 9 | + Module graph: |
| 10 | +
|
| 11 | + ┌──────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────────┐ |
| 12 | + │ SCC root │ │ importer of SCC leaf │ |
| 13 | + └──────────────────┘ └────────────────────────┘ |
| 14 | + │ ▲ │ ▲ │ |
| 15 | + ▼ │ ▼ │ ▼ |
| 16 | + ┌───────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ |
| 17 | + │ SCC leaf (TLA, throw) │ │ SCC leaf 2 │ |
| 18 | + └───────────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ |
| 19 | +
|
| 20 | + And let's assume that we import "SCC root" first and then, once its evaluation settles, |
| 21 | + we import "importer of SCC leaf". |
| 22 | +
|
| 23 | + This test exercises the case in which the condition in step 11.c.iv.3 of the following algorithm |
| 24 | + is true, when: |
| 25 | + - _module_ is "importer of SCC leaf", |
| 26 | + - _requiredModule_ is "SCC leaf", |
| 27 | + - _requiredModule_.[[CycleRoot]] is "SCC root". |
| 28 | +
|
| 29 | + After the sync pass of the evaluation of "SCC root", |
| 30 | + - the [[Status]] of "SCC leaf 2" is ~evaluated~, because even though it's in an |
| 31 | + async SCC after breaking the cycles it has no async dependencies. |
| 32 | + - the [[Status]] of "SCC leaf (TLA, throw)" and "SCC root" are ~evaluating-async~. |
| 33 | +
|
| 34 | + After that evaluation of "SCC leaf (TLA, throw)" resumes after the TLA, it throws |
| 35 | + and thus both its [[Status]] and "SCC root"'s [[Status]] are set to ~evaluated~, |
| 36 | + and their [[EvaluationError]] is set to the error thrown. |
| 37 | +
|
| 38 | + When later evaluating "importer of SCC leaf", its dependency "SCC leaf 2" has [[Status]] |
| 39 | + set to ~evaluated~ and no [[EvaluationError]], but "SCC leaf 2"'s [[CycleRoot]] has a |
| 40 | + non-empty [[EvaluationError]]. |
| 41 | +
|
| 42 | + InnerModuleEvaluation ( module, stack, index ) |
| 43 | + ... |
| 44 | + 11. For each ModuleRequest Record request of module.[[RequestedModules]], do |
| 45 | + a. Let requiredModule be GetImportedModule(module, request). |
| 46 | + b. Set index to ? InnerModuleEvaluation(requiredModule, stack, index). |
| 47 | + c. If requiredModule is a Cyclic Module Record, then |
| 48 | + i. Assert: requiredModule.[[Status]] is one of evaluating, evaluating-async, or evaluated. |
| 49 | + ii. Assert: requiredModule.[[Status]] is evaluating if and only if stack contains requiredModule. |
| 50 | + iii. If requiredModule.[[Status]] is evaluating, then |
| 51 | + 1. Set module.[[DFSAncestorIndex]] to min(module.[[DFSAncestorIndex]], requiredModule.[[DFSAncestorIndex]]). |
| 52 | + iv. Else, |
| 53 | + 1. Set requiredModule to requiredModule.[[CycleRoot]]. |
| 54 | + 2. Assert: requiredModule.[[Status]] is either evaluating-async or evaluated. |
| 55 | + 3. If requiredModule.[[EvaluationError]] is not empty, return ? requiredModule.[[EvaluationError]]. |
| 56 | +
|
| 57 | +flags: [module, async] |
| 58 | +features: [top-level-await] |
| 59 | +includes: [asyncHelpers.js] |
| 60 | +---*/ |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +asyncTest(async function() { |
| 63 | + const sccRootPromise = import("./evaluated-dep-from-async-errored-scc_scc-root_FIXTURE.js"); |
| 64 | + await assert.throwsAsync(Error, () => sccRootPromise, "Importing scc-root should reject"); |
| 65 | + const sccRootError = await sccRootPromise.catch(e => e); |
| 66 | + assert.sameValue(sccRootError, globalThis.evaluationError); |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | + const importerOfSccLeafPromise = import("./evaluated-dep-from-async-errored-scc_importer-of-scc-leaf_FIXTURE.js"); |
| 69 | + await assert.throwsAsync(Error, () => importerOfSccLeafPromise, "Importing importer of SCC leaf should reject"); |
| 70 | + const importerOfSccLeafError = await importerOfSccLeafPromise.catch(e => e); |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | + assert.sameValue(sccRootError, importerOfSccLeafError, "The errors should be the same"); |
| 73 | +}); |
0 commit comments