feat(website-server): Install repomix from GitHub main branch

[yamadashy]

Change repomix dependency from npm registry to GitHub main branch.

Changes

• Update repomix dependency from ^1.11.0 to github:yamadashy/repomix#main

Why

This allows the website server to use the latest development version of repomix directly from GitHub. With the prepare script added in #1053, repomix is automatically built when installed from GitHub.

Benefits

• Website server can test latest features before npm release
• Version is locked in package-lock.json for stable deployments
• Can be updated explicitly with npm update repomix when needed

Checklist

• Run npm run test
• Run npm run lint

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The repomix dependency in website/server/package.json is changed from npm registry semver version ^1.11.0 to a GitHub URL reference pointing to github:yamadashy/repomix#main. This switches package resolution from npm to the GitHub repository's main branch.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Dependency Update website/server/package.json	Updated repomix from semver specifier (^1.11.0) to GitHub URL reference (github:yamadashy/repomix#main), changing package source from npm registry to GitHub main branch

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• feat(build): Add prepare script for GitHub-based npm install #1053 — Adds a "prepare" script to ensure repomix builds correctly when installed directly from GitHub, addressing the build requirements for this GitHub URL-based dependency
• chore(website): Update repomix dependency to v1.4.1 #813 — Previously modified the repomix dependency in the same file, providing context for dependency version management

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: updating repomix to install from GitHub main branch instead of npm registry.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description covers all required template sections with clear changes, rationale, and benefits; both checklist items are marked complete.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @yamadashy, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request strategically modifies the website-server's dependency on the repomix library, shifting its source from the npm registry to the main branch of the repomix GitHub repository. This enables the server to immediately access and test the most current development features of repomix, thereby accelerating integration and feedback cycles. The change is designed to leverage an existing prepare script for automatic building upon installation and maintain deployment stability through package-lock.json.

Highlights

• Dependency Update: The repomix dependency has been updated from a specific npm registry version (^1.11.0) to directly reference the main branch of the yamadashy/repomix GitHub repository.
• Enabling Latest Features: This change allows the website server to utilize the very latest development version of repomix, facilitating early testing of new features before they are officially released on npm.
• Automated Build Process: Thanks to a prepare script introduced in a previous PR (feat(build): Add prepare script for GitHub-based npm install #1053), repomix will now automatically build itself when installed directly from GitHub, streamlining the development workflow.
• Deployment Stability: The version of the GitHub-sourced dependency will be locked in package-lock.json, ensuring stable and reproducible deployments.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the repomix dependency to point to the main branch on GitHub, which is a good approach for testing the latest development features on the website server. While this allows for rapid integration, I've added a comment regarding dependency pinning strategies to enhance build stability and predictability. Specifically, I suggest considering pinning to a specific commit hash to avoid pulling in potentially unstable changes from the main branch during updates.

[gemini-code-assist]

Pinning a dependency to a Git branch like main is useful for integrating the latest changes quickly. However, this can introduce instability, as the main branch may contain work-in-progress or breaking changes. An npm update could pull in these changes unexpectedly.

For greater stability and more predictable dependency updates, consider pinning to a specific commit hash instead. This ensures that you are always building against a known, fixed version of the code.

Example:

"repomix": "github:yamadashy/repomix#<specific-commit-hash>"

This would require manually updating the commit hash in package.json when you want to pull in new changes, making the update process more explicit. Given the context of testing the latest features, your current approach is understandable, but this is a common practice for ensuring build reproducibility.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying repomix with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	1f058ef
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://56deca08.repomix.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://feat-website-server-github-i.repomix.pages.dev

View logs

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b02cb5 and 59b498b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• website/server/package.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)

• GitHub Check: claude-review
• GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 20.x)
• GitHub Check: Build and run with Bun (windows-latest, latest)
• GitHub Check: Memory Test
• GitHub Check: Lint Secretlint
• GitHub Check: Lint TypeScript
• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
• GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.34%. Comparing base (5b02cb5) to head (1f058ef).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1055   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.34%   90.34%           
=======================================
  Files         123      123           
  Lines        9457     9457           
  Branches     1709     1709           
=======================================
  Hits         8544     8544           
  Misses        913      913           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[claude]

Code Review - Claude

Summary

This PR changes the repomix dependency in the website server from npm registry (^1.11.0) to GitHub main branch (github:yamadashy/repomix#main). The change is minimal and well-motivated, building on PR #1053 which added the prepare script for GitHub-based installs.

Analysis

Pros:

• Enables testing latest development features before npm release
• prepare script in main package.json ensures automatic build on install
• Version locking through package-lock.json provides deployment stability
• Simple, single-line change with minimal risk

Considerations:

1. Dockerfile Build Process - Potential Issue

The Dockerfile uses --ignore-scripts in the production dependencies stage (line 27):

RUN npm ci --only=production --ignore-scripts && \
    npm cache clean --force

However, this won't affect the GitHub install because:

1. The builder stage runs npm ci without --ignore-scripts, triggering the prepare script
2. The production deps stage copies only node_modules, and repomix is already built from the builder stage

This is actually fine, but worth noting for future reference.

2. Commit Hash Pinning Trade-off

Gemini suggested pinning to a specific commit hash instead of #main. While this provides more stability, the PR author's approach using package-lock.json achieves similar stability:

• The lock file pins to a specific commit SHA at install time
• Explicit npm update repomix is required to update
• Using #main makes the intent clear: always get latest on update

The current approach is reasonable for a development/testing server. Consider commit pinning only if build reproducibility becomes critical.

3. Missing package-lock.json Update

The package-lock.json doesn't yet contain the GitHub reference. This should be regenerated by running npm install in the website/server/ directory to lock to a specific commit. This is likely just not committed yet, but should be verified before merge.

Premortem Analysis - Potential Failure Scenarios

Scenario	Risk	Mitigation
main branch has broken code	Low - CI runs before merge	package-lock.json pins to tested commit
Build fails in CI	Medium	Ensure npm install runs prepare script in cloud build
Missing build tools in Docker	Low	node:24-alpine includes npm/node, sufficient for TypeScript build
Rate limiting on GitHub installs	Low	npm caches GitHub tarball, cloud build uses caching

Verdict

Approved - This is a well-thought-out change with clear benefits for the development workflow. The implementation is correct and builds upon the foundation laid in PR #1053.

Recommendations before merge:

1. Ensure package-lock.json is regenerated with npm install in website/server/ to pin the current commit
2. Consider adding a note in the server README about updating the dependency with npm update repomix

---

🤖 Review by Claude

[claude]

Code Review Update - Claude

Summary

This is an incremental review following the second commit (fix(website-server): Add git to Docker build stages and update lock file). The changes effectively address issues identified in the previous review.

Changes Since Last Review

Issues Addressed:

1. Git installation added to Docker - Both builder and deps stages now install git via apk add --no-cache git, which is required for GitHub-based npm dependencies.

2. npm flag modernization - Changed --only=production (deprecated) to --omit=dev (current recommended flag).

3. package-lock.json properly updated - The lock file now pins to commit 5b02cb56ed606f283e2fd118e07e69c75ee99d8b, ensuring reproducible builds.

Code Quality Assessment

Aspect	Rating	Notes
Correctness	Good	Changes are functional and well-tested
Consistency	Good	Git installation pattern matches existing runtime stage
Security	Good	No security concerns - using official package manager
Docker best practices	Good	--no-cache for apk, clean structure

Premortem Analysis

Potential Failure Scenarios

Scenario	Risk Level	Mitigation
Main branch breaks	Low	Lock file pins specific commit; explicit update required
SSH key auth in CI	Very Low	npm uses HTTPS for github: protocol, not SSH
Docker image size increase	Negligible	git package adds ~2MB, acceptable trade-off
Build time increase	Minimal	One extra apk add per stage

Minor Observation

The --ignore-scripts flag in the deps stage (line 33) will skip the prepare script during production dependency installation. This is intentional and correct because:

• The builder stage runs npm ci without --ignore-scripts, building repomix
• The deps stage only needs the pre-built artifacts, not to rebuild

Verdict

Approved - The second commit properly addresses the Docker build requirements for GitHub-based dependencies. The implementation is clean and follows best practices.

---

Review by Claude (Opus 4.5)