Updated README.md to include object compare

[designxtek]

In reference to #93 on verifying calls with objects

[NagRock]

What do you think about separate section in readme.md about matchers?

[designxtek]

Yeah I could create a separate section. I'm not too familiar with it but I can start something.

[NagRock]

Would be great

[designxtek]

Added a new section. Let me know if there is any other changes needed. Thanks

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #94 into master will increase coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #94      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.58%   94.89%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          35       34       -1     
  Lines         609      607       -2     
  Branches       69       69              
==========================================
  Hits          576      576              
+ Misses         24       22       -2     
  Partials        9        9

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/stub/MethodStub.ts

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 93d6625...996b81f. Read the comment docs.

[yankeeinlondon]

@NagRock I just started using this library yesterday so i'm a newbie but wondering about PR's like this which pass all tests and were introduced over a year ago. Is this library still being supported? Just a bit worried I may have gotten to the party too late 😆

[avneesh91]

@NagRock Can we please merge this, I think a lot of people will go through this issue(and would help to save a lot of time).

Thanks.

[henrikra]

Good to merge!

[alexanderfokau]

Merge when?

[designxtek]

I totally forgot about this