Skip to content

Increment versions for servicefabricmanagedclusters releases #45853

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Increment package versions for servicefabricmanagedclusters releases

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 26, 2025 19:03
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. label Jun 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR increments the package version for the Service Fabric Managed Clusters client to 1.1.0-beta.2 and prepares the changelog and versioning files for that release.

  • Bump azure-resourcemanager-servicefabricmanagedclusters version from 1.1.0-beta.1 to 1.1.0-beta.2
  • Add an “Unreleased” section for 1.1.0-beta.2 in the changelog
  • Update version_client.txt to reflect the new beta version

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
sdk/servicefabricmanagedclusters/.../pom.xml Updated <version> to 1.1.0-beta.2
sdk/servicefabricmanagedclusters/.../CHANGELOG.md Added ## 1.1.0-beta.2 (Unreleased) section headings
eng/versioning/version_client.txt Updated servicefabricmanagedclusters entry to beta.2

@XiaofeiCao XiaofeiCao merged commit da1fd36 into Azure:main Jun 27, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants