Skip to content

New Models - Add openai gpt-4.1 model family #9988

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

ishaan-jaff
Copy link
Contributor

@ishaan-jaff ishaan-jaff commented Apr 14, 2025

New Models - Add openai gpt-4.1 model family

Adds the following models

  • gpt-4.1
  • gpt-4.1-mini
  • gpt-4.1-nano

Relevant issues

Pre-Submission checklist

Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR

  • I have Added testing in the tests/litellm/ directory, Adding at least 1 test is a hard requirement - see details
  • I have added a screenshot of my new test passing locally
  • My PR passes all unit tests on (make test-unit)[https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/extras/contributing_code]
  • My PR's scope is as isolated as possible, it only solves 1 specific problem

Type

🆕 New Feature
✅ Test

Changes

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
litellm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 14, 2025 7:16pm

Copy link
Collaborator

@xingyaoww xingyaoww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only two issues on cached input cost for nano, otherwise LGTM
image

@krrishdholakia
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ishaan-jaff added already via - #9990

Copy link
Collaborator

@xingyaoww xingyaoww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now it LGTM!

@@ -89,6 +89,156 @@
"search_context_size_high": 0.050
}
},
"gpt-4.1": {
"max_tokens": 1047576,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this one be the same as max_output_tokens?

@ishaan-jaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing my PR in favor of: bbb7541

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants