Skip to content

[pull] main from electron:main#3

Open
pull[bot] wants to merge 4911 commits intoBlaquez-home:mainfrom
electron:main
Open

[pull] main from electron:main#3
pull[bot] wants to merge 4911 commits intoBlaquez-home:mainfrom
electron:main

Conversation

@pull
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pull pull Bot commented Aug 25, 2021

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

@commit-lint
Copy link
Copy Markdown

commit-lint Bot commented Aug 25, 2021

Features

Continuous Integration

Code Refactoring

Chore

Tests

Bug Fixes

Documentation

Contributors

codebytere, dsanders11, ckerr, aiddya, tr2-harada, miniak, zcbenz, brhenrique, erickzhao, wanted002, jkleinsc

Commit-Lint commands

You can trigger Commit-Lint actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @Commit-Lint merge patch will merge dependabot PR on "patch" versions (X.X.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge minor will merge dependabot PR on "minor" versions (X.Y.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge major will merge dependabot PR on "major" versions (Y.Y.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge disable will desactivate merge dependabot PR
  • @Commit-Lint review will approve dependabot PR
  • @Commit-Lint stop review will stop approve dependabot PR

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mergify Bot commented Apr 15, 2022

@pull-request-quantifier[bot] is not allowed to run commands

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137834 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80898 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13186 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

2 similar comments
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137834 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80898 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13186 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137834 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80898 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13186 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

8 similar comments
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137861 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80925 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2249

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3505 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

11 similar comments
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 137868 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Large
Size       : +80932 -56936
Percentile : 100%

Total files changed: 2250

Change summary by file extension:
.gitignore : +10 -4
.yml : +3512 -2860
.js : +2889 -5054
.json : +1688 -466
.lock : +0 -0
.sh : +20 -8
.clang-tidy : +4 -0
.md : +10372 -5319
.git-blame-ignore-revs : +5 -0
.gitattributes : +20 -4
.nvmrc : +1 -1
.gn : +626 -402
.gni : +1333 -411
.py : +415 -446
.json5 : +5 -1
.tmpl : +60 -0
.h : +6098 -4371
.cc : +15909 -11979
.ts : +20742 -14930
.html : +1478 -1401
.css : +2 -0
.svg : +0 -97
.grd : +0 -6
.grdp : +0 -123
.patches : +113 -64
.patch : +13213 -6720
.bat : +15 -25
.ps1 : +0 -8
.manifest : +43 -26
.mm : +2089 -1797
.plist : +26 -1
.rc : +0 -59
.sigs : +10 -0
.fragment : +2 -0
.mojom : +25 -13
.idl : +92 -2
.eslintrc : +0 -30
.cpp : +9 -6
.txt : +1 -274
.mjs : +48 -0
.gyp : +32 -0
.github/CODEOWNERS : +3 -2
DEPS : +20 -23
ELECTRON_VERSION : +0 -1
script/git-export-patches : +1 -1
script/git-import-patches : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

dsanders11 and others added 30 commits April 23, 2026 09:52
Add Linux-only app tests to check the default protocol handler.
This includes adding reusable XDG mock fixtures.
* build: use 32-core Windows ARC runners for build jobs

* ci: add siso patch to retry ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER on ninja file open

The existing patch removes the redundant per-chunk re-open in
fileParser.readFile, but the single remaining os.Open per subninja can
still hit the bindflt race under the ~90k-file concurrent open burst on
the 32-core Windows runners. Layer a second patch on top that wraps that
open in a Windows-only 5-attempt retry (5-80ms backoff) so a single
transient failure no longer aborts the whole manifest load.
…tocol()` (#51251)

perf: use GIO instead of xdg-mime for app.getApplicationNameForProtocol()

The Linux impl of app.getApplicationNameForProtocol() now uses
`g_app_info_get_default_for_uri_scheme()` + `g_app_info_get_display_name()`
instead of spawning a call to the `xdg-mime` shell command.

Clean up the related tests: remove the xdg-mime mock.
* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7779.0

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7781.0

* 7726883: Add secondary label support to SimpleMenuModel and update views_examples

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7726883

Co-Authored-By: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>

* chore: update patches (trivial only)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>

* fix: IWYU for base/logging.h

Upstream is removing transitive includes of base/logging.h as part of
crbug.com/499476145. Several CLs landed in this roll that required
adding explicit includes across Electron source and patches.

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7732103
Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7735571

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7732482: [bedrock] Create BrowserProcess setters for system tray icons

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7732482

Co-Authored-By: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>

* chore: update patches (trivial only)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>

* 7739543: Add RenderWidgetHostView::HasSavedFrame

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7739543

Co-Authored-By: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7783.0

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7789.0

* chore: update patches (trivial only)

* 7703728: DedicatedWorker: Enforce same-origin check for main script fetch.

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7703728

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7720140: Remove GetPrefServiceForContext from ExtensionsBrowserClient

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7720140

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: update patches (trivial only)

* 7728375: Disable reentrancy by default except for Android and iOS

Upstream changed the default ObserverList reentrancy policy from
kAllowReentrancy to kDisallowReentrancy. Electron's observer lists
are re-entered when macOS AppKit delivers synchronous window
notifications (e.g. windowDidResignMain: during windowDidChangeOcclusionState:)
because JS event handlers can trigger window state changes mid-iteration.

Explicitly opt into kAllowReentrancy for now. A follow-up should
convert synchronous Emit calls in window observer callbacks to
EmitEventSoon to eliminate the reentrancy.

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7728375

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7791.1

* chore: update patches (trivial only)

* 7696481: [pdf] Rename PdfViewerStreamManager to MimeHandlerStreamManager

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7696481

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7745796: Printing: Remove parameter from ShowScriptedPrintPreview() interface

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7745796

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7688714: [Lens / Cookies] Grant secure cookie exemptions for Lens side panel

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7688714

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7752609: don't show glic button for non-normal BWIs.

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7752609

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7749860: [media] Remove VideoFrame::WrapSharedImage with coded_size

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7749860

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7793.0

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7795.0

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7797.0

* chore: update patches

* chore: remove upstreamed patches

- fix_pass_trigger_for_global_shortcuts_on_wayland.patch: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7620219
- gin_mark_argumentholder_as_cppgc_stack_allocated.patch: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7728865

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: bump chromium in DEPS to 149.0.7798.0

* chore: update filenames.libcxx.gni

* 7760061: Reland Reland Add a client-side decorated frame view for non-browser widgets on Linux

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7760061

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7760945: Rename WebString::UTF8ConversionMode to Utf8ConversionMode

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7760945

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: update patches

* chore: remove upstreamed patches

- patches/devtools_frontend/fix_context_selector_not_showing_execution_contexts.patch: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/devtools/devtools-frontend/+/7761316

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7719004: [extensions] Gate dict-format mime_types_handler parsing

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7719004

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7716681: [pdf] Introduce MimeHandlerStreamDelegate and plumb ownership

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7716681

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7725342: Rename WebString::FromUTF8 to FromUtf8 in Blink

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7725342

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7615475: Add a native frame view for non-browser widgets on Linux

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7615475

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7735248: Move ManifestV2ExperimentManager to //extensions

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7735248

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7725187: linux: set env FC_FONTATIONS and EGL_PLATFORM early

Move Ozone pre-init from ElectronBrowserMainParts::PreEarlyInitialization()
to ElectronMainDelegate::PreSandboxStartup() to match upstream's rename
and relocation. The call has to run before threads are created.

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7725187

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* 7743280: Introduce client ID for network throttling conditions.

Ref: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7743280

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: disable ml-kem node test incompatible with BoringSSL

test-crypto-pqc-key-objects-ml-kem: BoringSSL's ML-KEM support is
inconsistent with the test's OpenSSL-version-based assumptions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: update V8 serialization wire format version to 16

V8 14.9 (Chromium 149) bumped the serialization wire format from
version 15 to 16. Update the hardcoded expected bytes in the
test-v8-serdes.js test.

Remove this patch once upstream Node.js catches up via its next
V8 roll.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: electron-roller[bot] <84116207+electron-roller[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Maddock <samuelmaddock@electronjs.org>
Co-authored-by: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: clavin <clavin@electronjs.org>
* build: restrict npm tarball contents to an explicit allowlist

The npm publish flow runs `npm pack` in a staging temp dir, but
`npm/package.json` had no `files` field — so any file that happened
to land in that dir was packed into the published tarball.

Recent releases (41.2.1+, 40.9.1+, 39.8.8+) shipped a self-referential
`.npm-cache/_logs/*-debug-0.log` (npm's own debug log, written into
the pack dir before pack finishes reading files) and a stray copy of
`SHASUMS256.txt` that duplicates the info already in `checksums.json`.

Add an explicit `files` allowlist so only the intended contents are
packaged, regardless of staging-dir contamination. `package.json`,
`README.md`, and `LICENSE` are auto-included by npm.

Fixes #51290.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* build: include LICENSE and README.md in files allowlist

These are auto-included by npm regardless, but listing them makes the
intended contents of the tarball self-documenting alongside the other
entries.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Chromium 149.0.7798.0 roll bumped the pinned siso revision, and
upstream added a `path/filepath` import to file_parser.go. That broke
the import-block context for the 0002 ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER retry
patch, so `git am --3way` could no longer build a fake ancestor and the
build-siso-windows job started failing at the apply step.

Re-export both patches against the new siso SHA. No functional change to
the patched code; only line offsets, index hashes and the import context
move.
…51292)

* fix: pre-create thinlto-cache dir on Windows to avoid bindflt race

Co-Authored-By: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>

* fix: discover ThinLTO cache path from GN instead of hardcoding

Addresses review feedback from @deepak1556: the hardcoded
`out\Default\thinlto-cache` path goes out of sync if upstream
changes `cache_dir` in Chromium's build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn.

Read the `/lldltocache:` flag from `gn desc` on a linked target
(`//electron:electron_app`) and pre-create whatever path GN
actually configured. Skips the pre-create entirely when ThinLTO
is disabled (non-official builds), which is the correct no-op.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: run gn gen before discovering ThinLTO cache path

Previous attempt failed on Windows CI for two reasons:

1. `e init` does not run `gn gen` — out/Default is still unpopulated
   when the build step starts, so `gn desc` had nothing to introspect.
2. `e` writes informational lines to stderr (e.g. "INFO Auto-updates
   disabled"), which GitHub Actions' default $ErrorActionPreference =
   'Stop' turned into a terminating NativeCommandError before e build
   could run.

Run `gn gen` explicitly here so `gn desc` can report the effective
`/lldltocache:` path, and shell each `e` invocation through cmd.exe
so its informational stderr stays out of PowerShell's error stream.
`e build` re-uses the same generated build dir so gn gen is paid
once.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: revert to hardcoded thinlto-cache path, document the coupling

Dynamic discovery via `gn desc` required `gn gen` to run beforehand,
and `gn gen` can't run before `e build` on Windows CI — gn.exe isn't
installed in `src/third_party/gn/` or `src/buildtools/win/gn/` until
a Chromium gclient hook that the current CI workflow doesn't trigger.
`e build` works because the restored src cache lets it skip the gen
step; any attempt to force `gn gen` earlier fails with exit 2.

Go back to pre-creating the path the upstream default currently
resolves to, and leave a comment explaining the coupling so a future
upstream relocation fails loudly (via the original LLVM error) rather
than silently.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* ci: test with absolute paths for lld-link on windows

* fix: exclude system libs

* fix: skip abs wrapper for thin archive step
* ci: route rustc linker invocations through abs_link_wrapper

* fix: abs path to generated cmd file

* fix: remove extra quotes around args
* fix: add inputs to node_headers target for proper invalidation

The `generate_node_headers` action had no `inputs` declared, so Ninja
would not rebuild when node or V8 header files changed. This caused
stale headers to remain in gen/node_headers after a Node.js bump,
leading to build failures with errors in files like target_agent.h.

Add inputs including the install.py script (which determines which
headers to copy), key Node.js headers, inspector headers, and V8
version headers. Changes to any of these will now trigger regeneration.

https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZ1FBZCEkmDC1sRvPQnqp

* refactor: drive node_headers inputs from filenames.auto.gni

Wire the `generate_node_headers` action's inputs through the existing
auto_filenames mechanism so there is a single source of truth for which
files should invalidate the generated node_headers directory.

`script/gen-filenames.ts` now enumerates node and v8 header files via
filesystem scan and records them under `auto_filenames.node_header_sources`
in filenames.auto.gni, alongside install.py (which drives which headers
get copied). BUILD.gn consumes the list directly as the action's `inputs`
parameter.

The list will repopulate fully the next time `ts-node script/gen-filenames.ts`
runs (via lint-staged on any JS/TS commit), the same way webpack bundle
deps are refreshed today.

https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZ1FBZCEkmDC1sRvPQnqp

* chore: update filenames

* fmt

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* ci: run siso build as part of Apply Patches workflow

This adds a build-siso job that runs when DEPS or .github/siso-patches
change, so siso patch issues are detected before chromium rolls land.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01TggMjnXwKFFtuLQAsrGfA3

* ci: trigger rerun-apply-patches on siso-patches changes

https://claude.ai/code/session_01TggMjnXwKFFtuLQAsrGfA3

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Fix a crash in AutofillPopupView::Show() when the popup
tried to show itself after the parent's native view had
already gone away during teardown.

2026-04-23T20:44:32.7015810Z Received signal 11 SEGV_ACCERR 000000000160
2026-04-23T20:44:32.9322010Z 4   Electron Framework  ... views::Widget::IsVisible() const + 28
2026-04-23T20:44:32.9528810Z 6   Electron Framework  ... electron::AutofillPopupView::Show() + 200
2026-04-23T20:44:32.9632090Z 7   Electron Framework  ... electron::AutofillPopup::CreateView(...) + 1380
2026-04-23T20:44:32.9749770Z 8   Electron Framework  ... electron::AutofillDriver::ShowAutofillPopup(...) + 736
2026-04-23T20:44:33.0015220Z ✗ Electron tests failed with kill signal SIGSEGV.
test: fix race in reentrant loadURL() ready-to-commit test

Fix 'fails if loadurl is called after the navigation is ready to commit'
by using a done() callback to ensure the test waits for did-fail-load
before exiting.

Previously, the test would return and call afterEach(closeAllWindows),
potentially destroying the window while navigation was in flight.
#51286)

* fix: dispatch toast action and reply events from WinRT activation path

ToastEventHandler::Invoke previously returned S_OK without dispatching
whenever the activation arguments looked structured (type=action,
type=reply, or contained &tag=), on the assumption that the COM
INotificationActivationCallback::Activate path would deliver the event
instead. That assumption only holds when Windows actually invokes the
COM activator — which it does for MSIX-packaged apps launched cold, and
for unpackaged apps with a properly-registered CLSID when the app is
not already running. For non-MSIX apps with activationType="foreground"
while the app is running (the common case), Windows raises only the
in-process WinRT Activated event, so action and reply were silently
dropped.

Dispatch structured activations through the same HandleToastActivation
the COM path uses. User input (reply text, selection values) is pulled
from IToastActivatedEventArgs2::UserInput, which carries the data the
COM callback would otherwise have received via
NOTIFICATION_USER_INPUT_DATA.

Also drop the &tag= term from the structured-args check. Plain clicks
in Electron-generated XML don't carry tag=, and a custom toast_xml that
puts tag= on a click argument should now dispatch as a click rather
than being silently dropped.

* fix: release HSTRING out-params from toast activation
Pre-creating out\Default\thinlto-cache dodged the CreateDirectoryW
race on bindflt-mounted ARC runners but left CreateFileW for the
cache files inside still racy. Latest symptom (publish-x86-win on
the v43.0.0-nightly.20260425 re-run):

  lld-link: error: Failed to open cache file
  thinlto-cache\llvmcache-...: invalid argument

That is the same ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER bindflt returns under the
concurrent ThinLTO write load, just on a different file op.

Replace the pre-created directory with a junction at
out\Default\thinlto-cache pointing to $env:TEMP\electron-thinlto-cache
on the underlying volume. The reparse point is resolved in the I/O
manager before bindflt sees per-file operations, so cache reads and
writes bypass the filter driver entirely.

Idempotent for re-runs: detects an existing junction (without
following it via Remove-Item) and a leftover real directory from
older builds.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: make macOS text replacement work on `contenteditable`

* fix: remove accidentally included patch line
…1256)" (#51341)

* Revert "build: use 32-core Windows ARC runners for build jobs (#51256)"

This reverts commit 099c5c0.

* chore: put back siso patch

* Revert "fix: route ThinLTO cache through junction outside bindflt mount (#51328)"

This reverts commit 9e7a343.

* Revert "fix: pre-create thinlto-cache dir on Windows to avoid bindflt race (#51292)"

This reverts commit 98e91ca.
…51326)

a39108c (#47244) replaced gin_helper::EmitEvent with a direct
`v8::Function::Call()` in `WebWorkerObserver::ContextWillDestroy`
to avoid re-entering the microtask checkpoint during worker teardown.

V8 `DCHECK()`s that a policy is set. Under the old code path, this
happened with a node::CallbackScope. Under the new code path, it's
possible for a policy to not be set, causing that `DCHECK()` to fail.

This PR copies a39108c's changes in `ShareEnvironmentWithContext()`:
it explicitly adds a `kDoNotRunMicrotasks` scope.
…xt refresh (#51329)

fix: remove early capturer_.reset() that causes null deref on next refresh

Another followup to dad4ab6: remove the `capturer_.reset()` that
`desktop_media_list.patch` was adding `Worker::RefreshNextThumbnail()`.
Since we switched from the one-shot Update() model to the continuous
StartUpdating() model, resetting `capturer_` isn't necessary and is
now dangerous: ScheduleNextRefresh() posts a delayed Worker::Refresh()
that dereferences capturer_, causing a nullptr crash.

Under CI load, the NativeDesktopMediaList can survive long enough
for the next 1-second refresh cycle to fire before FinalizeList()
destroys it. The crash can manifest as either a SIGSEGV or a
DCHECK(can_refresh()) failure, which is extra fun because dad4ab6
was fixing a similar DCHECK crash in the first place.

Sample crash:

```
[6690:0426/173732.876803:FATAL:chrome/browser/media/webrtc/native_desktop_media_list.cc:934] DCHECK failed: can_refresh().0x00000001337aa7f3 NativeDesktopMediaList::RefreshForVizFrameSinkWindows(...) + 131
```
* perf: use GIO for Browser::IsDefaultProtocolClient() on Linux

perf: use GIO for Browser::SetAsDefaultProtocolClient() on Linux

Similar to 7d6227a, this speeds up app.isDefaultProtocolClient()
by using the GIO library instead of spawning a shell command to
get the info.

* feat: log errors if g_app_info_set_as_default_for_type() fails
…dy (#50920)

Added Browser::Get()->is_ready() guards to all contentTracing API functions (startRecording, stopRecording, getCategories, getTraceBufferUsage) so they reject their returned Promises with a clear error message instead of crashing when called before app.whenReady().

Added a crash-case fixture test that validates all four APIs reject properly before readiness and work normally after.
* fix: honor webContents.print dpi horizontal/vertical options

* style: fix clang-format in print dpi parsing

* style: extract print dpi key constants

* fix: use local dpi constants in print options parser
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.