Skip to content

add profile for qwen_model #114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: epic/jax-20250630
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aolemila
Copy link

Motivation

Modifications

Checklist

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @aolemila, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on integrating JAX profiling capabilities into the QWen model's test suite. The goal is to enable detailed performance analysis of the QWen model's decoding process. Additionally, it includes a minor correction to an expected output shape in a test and resolves a previous merge conflict.

Highlights

  • JAX Profiling Integration: I've added JAX profiler tracing to the test_qwen_model_decode method in test_qwen_model.py. This will generate performance profiles for the QWen model's decoding process, saving them to /root/users/aolemila/jax_profile_sglang_qwen/profile.
  • Test Adjustment for Profiling Accuracy: To ensure accurate profiling, I've added x.block_until_ready() within the test_qwen_model_decode method. This explicitly waits for JAX computations to complete before proceeding, ensuring all operations are captured by the profiler.
  • Vocabulary Size Correction: The expected vocabulary size in test_qwen_model_prefill was updated from 10000 to 10048. This corrects an assertion to match the actual output shape of the QWen model's logits.
  • Merge Conflict Resolution: A merge conflict related to the import of QWenLMHeadModel vs. QWenLMHeadJaxModel in test_qwen_model.py has been resolved, standardizing on QWenLMHeadJaxModel.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a profile for the Qwen model, including changes to the vocabulary size in the test, adding a JAX profiler trace, and adding a block until ready call. The changes seem reasonable, but the vocabulary size change and the profiler trace should be verified.

@@ -82,10 +78,10 @@ def test_qwen_model_prefill(self):
forward_batch.positions, forward_batch)
# Now y is LogitsProcessorOutput with next_token_logits for each sequence
# Shape: [batch_size, vocab_size] = [128, 10000]
self.assertEqual(y.next_token_logits.shape, (128, 10000))
self.assertEqual(y.next_token_logits.shape, (128, 10048))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The vocabulary size has changed. Ensure this change is intentional and that the model is correctly configured to handle the new vocabulary size.

self.assertEqual(y.next_token_logits.shape, (128, 10048))


def test_qwen_model_decode(self):
with self.mesh:
with self.mesh, jax.profiler.trace("/root/users/aolemila/jax_profile_sglang_qwen/profile", create_perfetto_link=True):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Adding a JAX profiler trace is useful for debugging and performance analysis. However, ensure that this profiling code is removed or disabled before merging into a production environment to avoid performance overhead.

with self.mesh, jax.profiler.trace("/root/users/aolemila/jax_profile_sglang_qwen/profile", create_perfetto_link=True):

@@ -123,6 +119,7 @@ def test_qwen_model_decode(self):
decoded_token = tokenizer.decode([current_token_id])
print(
f"Step {i+1}: token_id={current_token_id}, decoded='{decoded_token}'")
x.block_until_ready()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Adding x.block_until_ready() will ensure that the computation is complete before proceeding. This is useful for debugging and benchmarking, but can hurt performance if used unnecessarily. Consider if this block is needed in the long run.

x.block_until_ready()

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant