Skip to content

fix: Use either x509.not_valid_after_utc or if it does not exist, x509.not_valid_after #1307

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hessjcg
Copy link
Collaborator

@hessjcg hessjcg commented Jun 24, 2025

Some versions of python do not have a not_valid_after_utc but only contain the not_valid_after field. Update
the python connector to prefer not_valid_after_utc, but gracefully fall back to not_valid_after.

…9.not_valid_after
@hessjcg hessjcg requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2025 19:42
@hessjcg hessjcg closed this Jun 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants