Skip to content

Conversation

@guzhu271
Copy link

Description

[Briefly describe the changes made in this pull request.]

Related Issues

[Reference any related issues or tasks addressed by this pull request.]

Changes Made

[List the specific changes made in this pull request.]

Checklist

  • Changes tested locally
  • Code reviewed
  • Documentation updated (if necessary)
  • Unit tests added (if applicable)

Additional Notes

[Add any additional notes or context for the reviewer(s).]

Copy link
Collaborator

@danielaskdd danielaskdd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It appears the drop function in BaseGraphStorage has not been implemented yet. Additionally, the abstract method in BaseGraphStorage has been updated. Please sync with the main branch to incorporate the latest changes.

For verification, kindly conduct a thorough test of all graph-related functionalities in the WebUI of LightRAG Server, including:

  • Graph Retrieval: Ensure the max depth and max nodes options are functioning as intended.
  • Node Expand: Validate the expand feature works correctly.
  • Clear Document: Ensure the clear document can remove all the data in Graph DB

To confirm successful implementation, please provide screenshots demonstrating all graph view functionalities are operating as expected.

Let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification.

@guzhu271
Copy link
Author

截图_选择区域_20250429122823
截图_选择区域_20250429123010

@shell-nlp
Copy link

Great job, please merge this PR as soon as possible

@poppycoderr
Copy link

any update?

@danielaskdd
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your congratulations and efforts. As LightRAG evolves, each storage implementation necessitates corresponding upgrades. Currently, we lack the resources to consistently track and maintain the advancements and performance optimizations for every storage type. To avoid impeding the overall progress of the LightRAG system, LightRAG will temporarily discontinue the integration of new storage implementations.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 19, 2025
@danielaskdd danielaskdd added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 20, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Nov 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants