Skip to content

Feature/removeemojies #23

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 18, 2017
Merged

Feature/removeemojies #23

merged 11 commits into from
Apr 18, 2017

Conversation

JPeer264
Copy link
Owner

In the .sgcrc the option emojies can be used to disable emojies in the commit. For v2.0.0 we can disable emojies by default.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling f2cc45b on feature/removeemojies into ** on master**.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f2cc45b on feature/removeemojies into 2b3f53d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f2cc45b on feature/removeemojies into 2b3f53d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 18, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 9b615eb on feature/removeemojies into 2b3f53d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 18, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 9b615eb on feature/removeemojies into 2b3f53d on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 18, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 6d9f88f on feature/removeemojies into c005eb0 on master.

.sgcrc_default Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
{
"emojies": true,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

readme says emojies is default false, we should change the readme to true, or here to false.

@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ const choices = (configuration) => {
const choicesList = [];

configuration.types.forEach((type) => {
const emoji = `${type.emoji} ` || '';
const isEmojies = configuration.emojies === undefined ? true : configuration.emojies;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We do not have a emojies: false in the sgc_defalut, so this means the documentation in the readme is wrong... because if emojies is undefined, emojies = true we need to cheange this to false or we have to change the readme to default true

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

README.md Outdated

**Type:** `boolean`

**Default:** `false`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see lib/promptConfig.js

Copy link
Collaborator

@aichbauer aichbauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comments

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 18, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling db6978b on feature/removeemojies into c005eb0 on master.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aichbauer aichbauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 18, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling da9f53e on feature/removeemojies into 3326e5c on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 18, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 039b1d5 on feature/removeemojies into 3326e5c on master.

@JPeer264 JPeer264 merged commit b70f814 into master Apr 18, 2017
@JPeer264 JPeer264 deleted the feature/removeemojies branch April 18, 2017 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants