Skip to content

The Sol global network for public communication #7

@Julian-Dumitrascu

Description

@Julian-Dumitrascu

This is the only such network about which we know.

  1. We organise:
    1.1 public conversations like this one
    1.2 online public talks
    1.3 public meetings

  2. Benefits
    2.1 We can discuss the benefits of public conversations there.
    2.2 We can discuss the benefits of public talks as section 2 of this conversation.
    2.3 We can discuss here the benefits of public meetings.
    2.3.1 It is natural for people to spend time together, express themselves, and exchange energy. This helps us keep our balance and take steps forward.

  3. Topics
    Each participant can suggest a topic.
    3.1 One can suggest here a topic for a conversation.
    Once one does that, a Sol representative helps them start or join a conversation with that topic.
    3.2 One can suggest there a topic for an online talk.
    We try to schedule soon a talk with that topic.
    3.3 One can suggest here a topic for a meeting.
    Sol Event Management organises that meeting according to the requirements once one pays.
    We can organise meetings in many places for any number of participants.
    As we focus on communication, the main part of a meeting can be a public talk, which can be organised as a group talk with certain rules.
    One can suggest additional activities, e.g. a party.
    To the extent that such things are necessary, one can have Sol teams help one e.g. to travel to the meeting venue, and stay overnight and have meals close to the meeting venue.

  4. Structure
    4.2 Possible structures of online talks
    4.2.1 We maximise the time for a speech, so we minimise the number of speakers.
    Example: One lets us know that one wants to talk at length about something. We schedule a talk with one speaker. (Talker?(!))
    4.2.2 We let each speaker speak for any amount of time when their turn comes.
    One can speak for any number of times (within 12 hours).
    We can start talks as often as you like.
    4.2.3 We limit speeches to any number of minutes on which participants agree for a certain talk.

  5. One can use any such service at any time.
    5.1 One can enable notifications about any conversations and any talks.

  6. Pay
    6.1 To let one use any such service at any time, we can agree on flexible payments.
    For instance, one can transfer to us any amount at any time. From this balance, we deduct each amount on which we agree for each service.
    6.2 The more one uses a service, the more useful it can be to correlate it with one's current financial capital. This increases the probability that a good service remains available, whether we look at it
    a. from the user's perspective: when my capital is rather small, I keep using a service that can help me e.g. to keep my cool and to increase my capital.
    b. from the provider's perspective: each use of a service can increase the probability that the service will continue being provided, as the funds for it can be raised indirectly, too; user 1 pays less today, but their use can result in user 2 using the service more (than not at all).
    6.3 We can discuss paying a monthly fee.
    6.3.1 When we exchange messages, we could communicate without moderation. A group of people can restore imbalances in their communication. They can observe the rules on which they agree. We can discuss principles of communication. To the extent that we follow them, our communication is effective.
    To the extent that moderation proves useful, one can make a moderation plan, according to which they give one or more people the hard task of helping them communicate successfully.
    Given that many people have created online spaces and there is room to improve the benefit-cost ratio of the interactions through such spaces, as many people have made complaints and have expressed wishes that haven't been fulfilled, one can pay for moderation that helps one get more out of group telecommunication.
    It matters which plans we make and which costs we incur. Example: Do you choose the costs of poor management of an online space by people who complain that they are volunteers and that they are overwhelmed by this task, or the costs of a communication management service that Sol Global Management keeps trying to improve so that you benefit more from public communication?
    If up to a thousand people communicate in a space, one person might be able to support their communication.
    We start our negotiation of this subscription fee at USD 19 per month.
    6.3.2 One can subscribe for the ability to talk publicly as often as one likes for the purposes one chooses.
    We discuss what benefits you seek.
    We discuss what costs will be incurred. Example: man-hours
    To organise 100 hours of online talks, one might spend 250 man-hours, which can cost USD 20k: 200 per hour.
    It matters how many people participate in a talk on average. While this average would fluctuate naturally, we're not pushing for a high average, as every participant should have the opportunity to speak. What do you want? We've seen talks with hundreds of participants, during which few people spoke.
    Once we discuss the benefits you seek, choose topics, and agree on certain structures of these talks, we discuss the costs you accept. This helps us agree on the pricing and on any other terms.
    If we have to give a number for the people who like negotiating, we start our negotiation of this subscription fee at USD 90 per month.
    6.3.3 To the extent that some meetings are regular, we can discuss a subscription for event management.
    Otherwise, one pays considering the benefits and the costs of each event.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions