Skip to content

slightly change notations to prevent conflict with : of ssreflect #112

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

ildyria
Copy link
Contributor

@ildyria ildyria commented Nov 1, 2017

Proposed to solve: #111

rename : by <: .

@ildyria
Copy link
Contributor Author

ildyria commented Nov 1, 2017

All checked failed due to timeout (again).

@mansky1
Copy link
Collaborator

mansky1 commented Nov 1, 2017

Hmm. I'm going to try reorganizing the Travis script.

@mansky1
Copy link
Collaborator

mansky1 commented Nov 1, 2017

Could you merge master into your branch and then try again?

@andrew-appel
Copy link
Collaborator

I am very unhappy with this change. Why should an "only printing" notation cause a conflict with some other package? And why should ssreflect pollute my system and cause me to use an unnatural notation?

Thank you, ildyria, for identifying the problem and proposing this fix, but I would really like to discuss this with the Coq team. Can you write a sentence or two that explains the situation?

@ildyria ildyria force-pushed the ssReflect_notation_conflict branch from 2f57b88 to a02fe41 Compare November 9, 2017 16:56
@ildyria ildyria force-pushed the ssReflect_notation_conflict branch from c8fdf99 to f191c3d Compare December 15, 2017 13:54
@ildyria ildyria closed this Dec 18, 2017
@ildyria ildyria deleted the ssReflect_notation_conflict branch January 1, 2018 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants