Skip to content

Distribution affected by pull-through cache credential exfiltration via www-authenticate bearer realm

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 6, 2026 in distribution/distribution • Updated Apr 6, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/distribution/distribution (Go)

Affected versions

<= 2.8.3

Patched versions

None
gomod github.com/distribution/distribution/v3 (Go)
< 3.1.0
3.1.0

Description

hi guys,

commit: 40594bd98e6d6ed993b5c6021c93fdf96d2e5851 (as-of 2026-01-31)
contact: GitHub Security Advisory (https://github.com/distribution/distribution/security/advisories/new)

summary

in pull-through cache mode, distribution discovers token auth endpoints by parsing WWW-Authenticate challenges returned by the configured upstream registry. the realm URL from a bearer challenge is used without validating that it matches the upstream registry host. as a result, an attacker-controlled upstream (or an attacker with MitM position to the upstream) can cause distribution to send the configured upstream credentials via basic auth to an attacker-controlled realm URL.

this is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2020-15157 (containerd), but in distribution’s pull-through cache proxy auth flow.

severity

HIGH

note: the baseline impact is credential disclosure of the configured upstream credentials. if a deployment uses broader credentials for upstream auth (for example cloud iam credentials), the downstream impact can be higher; i am not claiming this as default for all deployments.

impact

credential exfiltration of the upstream authentication material configured for the pull-through cache.

attacker starting positions that make this realistic:

  • supply chain / configuration: an operator configures a proxy cache to use an upstream that becomes attacker-controlled (compromised registry, stale domain, or a malicious mirror)
  • network: MitM on the upstream connection in environments where the upstream is reachable over insecure transport or a compromised network path

affected components

  • registry/proxy/proxyauth.go:66-81 (getAuthURLs): extracts bearer realm from upstream WWW-Authenticate without validating destination
  • internal/client/auth/session.go:485-510 (fetchToken): uses the realm URL directly for token fetch
  • internal/client/auth/session.go:429-434 (fetchTokenWithBasicAuth): sends credentials via basic auth to the realm URL

reproduction

attachment: poc.zip (local harness) with canonical and control runs.

the harness is local and does not contact a real registry: it uses two local HTTP servers (upstream + attacker token service) to demonstrate whether basic auth is sent to an attacker-chosen realm.

unzip -q -o poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make canonical
make control

expected output (excerpt):

[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth
[PROOF_MARKER]: basic_auth_sent=true realm_host=127.0.0.1 account_param=user authorization_prefix=Basic

control output (excerpt):

[CALLSITE_HIT]: getAuthURLs::configureAuth
[NC_MARKER]: realm_validation=PASS basic_auth_sent=false

suggested remediation

validate that the token realm destination is within the intended trust boundary before associating credentials with it or sending any authentication to it. one conservative option is strict same-host binding: only accept a realm whose host matches the configured upstream host.

fix accepted when

  • distribution does not send configured upstream credentials to an attacker-chosen realm URL
  • a regression test covers the canonical and blocked cases

addendum.md
poc.zip
PR_DESCRIPTION.md
RUNNABLE_POC.md

best,
oleh

References

@milosgajdos milosgajdos published to distribution/distribution Apr 6, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 6, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 6, 2026
Reviewed Apr 6, 2026
Last updated Apr 6, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(8th percentile)

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-33540

GHSA ID

GHSA-3p65-76g6-3w7r

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.