Skip to content

Calculate advantage in Explorer#148

Merged
pan-x-c merged 13 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
pan-x-c:feature/advantage_in_explorer
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

Calculate advantage in Explorer#148
pan-x-c merged 13 commits intoagentscope-ai:mainfrom
pan-x-c:feature/advantage_in_explorer

Conversation

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pan-x-c pan-x-c commented Jul 28, 2025

Description

  • Add GroupAdvantageAddStrategy to calculate advantages in Explorer side
  • Refactor some existing AdvantageFn to be compatible with AddStrategy.
  • Unify and simplify the configuration of AdvantageFn

Checklist

Please check the following items before code is ready to be reviewed.

  • Code has passed all tests
  • Docstrings have been added/updated in Google Style
  • Documentation has been updated
  • Code is ready for review

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @pan-x-c, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've been working on enhancing how advantages are calculated within the Explorer component. My main focus has been on introducing a new GroupAdvantageStrategy that allows for advantage calculations on grouped experiences. To support this, I've refactored existing advantage functions (GRPO and OPMD) to be compatible with this new strategy and updated the core AddStrategy interface to provide more detailed metrics. Additionally, I've made a small but important improvement to how vLLM versions are handled to increase robustness.

Highlights

  • New Group Advantage Strategy: I've introduced a new abstract base class, GroupAdvantageStrategy, which provides a structured way to calculate advantages for groups of experiences. This class defines abstract methods for grouping experiences and calculating group-specific advantages.
  • Concrete Implementations for Grouped Advantages: I've added two concrete implementations of GroupAdvantageStrategy: GRPOAddStrategy and OPMDAddStrategy. These new strategies leverage the existing GRPOAdvantageFn and OPMDAdvantageFn to calculate advantages within grouped experiences.
  • Refactored Advantage Functions: I've refactored the GRPOAdvantageFn and OPMDAdvantageFn to be more flexible. They now accept a List[Experience] as input and return a Tuple containing the modified experiences and a dictionary of metrics, making them compatible with the new AddStrategy interface.
  • Updated AddStrategy Interface: The AddStrategy interface has been updated to include metrics in its return type. The add method now returns a Tuple of the number of experiences added and a dictionary of metrics, providing more comprehensive feedback on the addition process.
  • Improved vLLM Version Handling: I've improved the handling of vLLM versions by introducing a new get_vllm_version function. This function robustly parses the vLLM version, including a fallback for self-compiled versions that might not have a standard version string, ensuring better compatibility and error handling.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a GroupAdvantageStrategy to calculate advantages on the Explorer side, along with concrete implementations for GRPO and OPMD. It also refactors existing advantage functions to be compatible with the new strategy. The changes are a good step towards unifying advantage calculations. I've found a few critical issues and a high-severity issue that should be addressed.

@pan-x-c pan-x-c changed the title [WIP] Calculate advantage in Explorer Calculate advantage in Explorer Jul 29, 2025
@pan-x-c pan-x-c requested a review from Copilot July 29, 2025 04:14
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the advantage calculation system to move advantage computation from the trainer to the explorer side. The key changes involve introducing new GroupAdvantageAddStrategy classes and simplifying the configuration by removing algorithm-specific advantage functions.

  • Introduces GroupAdvantageAddStrategy with concrete implementations for GRPO and OPMD algorithms
  • Moves advantage calculation logic from trainer to explorer's add strategy
  • Consolidates utility functions by moving to_data_proto and compute_data_metrics from converter to utils module

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
trinity/trainer/verl_trainer.py Updates imports and removes advantage-related conditional logic
trinity/trainer/verl/utils.py New utility module containing data conversion and metrics computation functions
trinity/trainer/verl/converter.py Deleted file with functions moved to utils module
trinity/trainer/trainer.py Removes monitor close call in shutdown method
trinity/explorer/explorer.py Updates add strategy call to handle returned metrics
trinity/common/models/api/vllm_patch.py Refactors VLLM version handling with error handling for invalid versions
trinity/cli/launcher.py Updates launcher output messages formatting
trinity/algorithm/algorithm.py Changes algorithm defaults to use new add_strategy configuration
trinity/algorithm/add_strategy/add_strategy.py Major refactor introducing GroupAdvantageStrategy and concrete implementations
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py Updates test configuration to use new add_strategy parameter

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

pan-x-c commented Jul 29, 2025

/unittest-all

@pan-x-c
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

pan-x-c commented Jul 29, 2025

/unittest-all

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
65 65 0 0 0 0 1.4s

Tests

Test Name Status Flaky Duration
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_dpo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_mix_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_opmd_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_ppo_policy_loss 1ms
tests/algorithm/policy_loss_test.py::VerlPolicyLossTest::test_sft_policy_loss 1ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_buffer 2ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_reader 1ms
tests/buffer/file_test.py::TestFileBuffer::test_file_writer 2ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_priority_queue_buffer_reuse 7ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_priority_queue_capacity 3ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_0_queue 3ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_1_priority_queue 4ms
tests/buffer/queue_test.py::TestQueueBuffer::test_queue_buffer_capacity 4ms
tests/buffer/sql_test.py::TestSQLBuffer::test_create_sql_buffer 4ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_all_examples_are_valid 2ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_continue_from_checkpoint_is_valid 1ms
tests/common/config_test.py::TestConfig::test_load_default_config 7ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestEID::test_eid_properties 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_action_mask_and_logprobs_type 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_assertions 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_dpo_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_gather 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_multi_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_serialize_deserialize 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_single_turn_experience 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperience::test_to_dict 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_dpo_experience_batch_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_experience_model_experience_conversion 1ms
tests/common/experience_test.py::TestExperienceConversion::test_multiturn_experience_batch_converstion 1ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_0::test_generate 39ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_1::test_generate 50ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_2::test_generate 52ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_3::test_generate 39ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::ModelWrapperTest_4::test_generate 50ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestAPIServer::test_api 28ms
tests/common/vllm_test.py::TestTokenizer::test_assistant_token_mask 1ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::BaseExplorerCase::test_explorer 1ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownEval::test_explorer 88ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerCountdownNoEval::test_explorer 90ms
tests/explorer/explorer_test.py::TestExplorerWithAddStrategy::test_explorer 59ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_concurrent_operations 4ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_get_results 19ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_all_methods 14ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_scheduler_restart_after_stop 8ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_split_tasks 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all 7ms
tests/explorer/scheduler_test.py::SchedulerTest::test_wait_all_timeout_with_multi_batch 13ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_gsm8k_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_boxed_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_complex_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_fraction_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_math_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_rm_gallery_workflow 1ms
tests/explorer/workflow_test.py::WorkflowTest::test_workflow_resettable 1ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::BaseTrainerCase::test_trainer 1ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerCountdown::test_trainer 241ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestStepAheadAsyncRL::test_trainer 92ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerGSM8K::test_trainer 70ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFTWarmupGSM8K::test_trainer 83ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerDPO::test_trainer 44ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestTrainerSFT::test_trainer 37ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode::test_fully_async_mode_0_queue 86ms
tests/trainer/trainer_test.py::TestFullyAsyncMode::test_fully_async_mode_1_priority_queue 90ms
tests/utils/plugin_test.py::TestPluginLoader::test_load_plugins 4ms

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@yanxi-chen yanxi-chen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see the inline comments, otherwise lgtm

@pan-x-c pan-x-c merged commit 65d7384 into agentscope-ai:main Jul 30, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants