Skip to content

fix: set add_generation_prompt to False when apply chat template for multimodal #2859

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NanoCode012
Copy link
Collaborator

@NanoCode012 NanoCode012 commented Jul 3, 2025

Description

For some reason, add_generation_prompt was set to true which can lead to unexpected effects in multimodal.

Motivation and Context

How has this been tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

Social Handles (Optional)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted chat processing to no longer add a generation prompt during message handling.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The update changes the add_generation_prompt parameter from True to False when calling apply_chat_template within the process_rows function in the multimodal chat collator utility. This adjustment disables the addition of a generation prompt in the chat template processing step.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/axolotl/utils/collators/mm_chat.py Changed add_generation_prompt argument from True to False in apply_chat_template call.

Poem

A toggle flipped, a prompt set free,
No generation hint for chat to see.
The collator now, with subtle grace,
Leaves out the prompt in every case.
Quietly the code hops on,
As rabbits do when dusk is gone.

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Pylint (3.3.7)
src/axolotl/utils/collators/mm_chat.py
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8ae5a23 and 7f1b873.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/axolotl/utils/collators/mm_chat.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
  • GitHub Check: PyTest from Source Dist (3.11, 2.5.1)
  • GitHub Check: PyTest (3.11, 2.7.1)
  • GitHub Check: PyTest from Source Dist (3.11, 2.7.1)
  • GitHub Check: pre-commit
  • GitHub Check: PyTest from Source Dist (3.11, 2.6.0)
  • GitHub Check: PyTest (3.11, 2.5.1)
  • GitHub Check: PyTest (3.11, 2.6.0)
  • GitHub Check: pre-commit

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ def process_rows(
# This method requires transformers>=4.49.0
result = self.processing_strategy.processor.apply_chat_template(
example["messages"],
add_generation_prompt=True,
add_generation_prompt=False,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

LGTM! This fix aligns with multimodal processing requirements.

Setting add_generation_prompt=False is appropriate for multimodal contexts where you want explicit control over the chat template structure rather than automatically adding generation prompts that might interfere with multimodal processing.

However, please verify that this change doesn't break existing functionality by running the following script to check for any tests or usage patterns that might be affected:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of changing add_generation_prompt behavior

# Search for any tests related to this collator
echo "=== Searching for tests related to MultiModalChatDataCollator ==="
fd -e py -x grep -l "MultiModalChatDataCollator" {} \;

# Search for any other usage of add_generation_prompt in the codebase
echo "=== Searching for other usage of add_generation_prompt ==="
rg "add_generation_prompt" -A 3 -B 3

# Search for any documentation or comments about generation prompts in multimodal context
echo "=== Searching for documentation about generation prompts ==="
rg -i "generation.prompt" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 208150


Add tests for MultiModalChatDataCollator’s new default

I didn’t find any existing tests that exercise MultiModalChatDataCollator in src/axolotl/utils/collators/mm_chat.py—changing add_generation_prompt there to False can alter how multimodal examples are formatted. Please:

• Create or extend unit tests for MultiModalChatDataCollator.process_rows, verifying both with and without a generation prompt
• Add an integration/​e2e scenario that runs a simple multimodal example through the collator and confirms the prompt ends (or doesn’t end) with an assistant turn as expected
• Ensure downstream consumers (e.g. in src/axolotl/core/builders/causal.py) still behave correctly when add_generation_prompt=False

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/axolotl/utils/collators/mm_chat.py at line 53, the default value of
add_generation_prompt was changed to False, which affects how multimodal
examples are formatted. To fix this, add or extend unit tests for
MultiModalChatDataCollator.process_rows to cover cases both with
add_generation_prompt set to True and False, verifying the formatting of the
generation prompt. Additionally, create an integration or end-to-end test that
processes a simple multimodal example through the collator and checks that the
prompt ends correctly with or without an assistant turn. Finally, verify that
downstream consumers, such as those in src/axolotl/core/builders/causal.py,
continue to function correctly when add_generation_prompt is False.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant