-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
[15.0.X] ScoutingCollectionMonitor
add muon "Vtx" collections
#48456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[15.0.X] ScoutingCollectionMonitor
add muon "Vtx" collections
#48456
Conversation
type ngt |
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for CMSSW_15_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @mmusich, @rseidita can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
cms-bot internal usage |
- fix the displacedVertices input collections
…Vtx and hltScoutingMuonPackerNoVtx
443ebba
to
801c9de
Compare
Pull request #48456 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @mmusich, @rseidita can you please check and sign again. |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
Pull request #48456 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @mmusich, @rseidita can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
let's wait to have an IB in 15.0.X which solves #48443 to test again, in order to get cleaner comparisons. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt |
+dqm |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_15_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_15_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #48453
PR description:
This PR is a follow-up to #47923 and #48089.
In the first implementation of
ScoutingCollectionMonitor
we didn't add the monitoring of the muons coming from the "Vtx" reconstruction (collectionhltScoutingMuonPackerVtx
). We're adding support for that in this PR.In the meanwhile, I correct what I think it's a bug.
The
displacedVertices
used to have the followingInputTag
("hltScoutingMuonPackerNoVtx","displacedVtx")
(so the vertex coming from the "noVtx" reconstruction). IIUC that's the just the PV of the event. I substitute that with("hltScoutingMuonPackerVtx","displacedVtx")
which should contain the vertex from the di-muon.PR validation:
I've run the following workflows:
runTheMatrix.py -l 145.415 -t 4 -j 8 # 47327
as well as
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Verbatim backport of #48453 for 2025 data-taking operations.
Cc: @jprendi