Skip to content

Phase 4: Review status indicators and update functionality #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2025

Conversation

mattgodbolt
Copy link
Member

Summary

  • Complete review management system with visual status indicators, progress tracking, and update functionality
  • Professional interface for conducting human evaluations of the prompt testing framework

Test plan

  • Load existing review results and verify status indicators appear correctly (green ✅ for reviewed, red ⚪ for pending)
  • Verify progress bar shows accurate completion percentage in header
  • Test form pre-population with existing review data when clicking on reviewed cases
  • Confirm "Save Review" vs "Update Review" button text changes appropriately
  • Test real-time status updates when saving new reviews or updating existing ones
  • Verify review persistence across page refreshes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

mattgodbolt and others added 2 commits June 5, 2025 14:59
Implement comprehensive review management system with:

Backend:
- New API endpoint `/api/reviews/prompt/<version>` to load existing reviews
- Groups reviews by case_id for efficient frontend consumption

Frontend:
- Visual status indicators: green border + ✅ for reviewed, red border + ⚪ for pending
- Automatic form pre-population with existing review data
- Dynamic button text: "Save Review" vs "Update Review" based on status
- Progress tracking with animated bar showing "X/Y cases reviewed (Z%)"
- Real-time status updates when reviews are saved/updated
- State management for existing reviews and progress counters

This creates a professional review interface that handles the full lifecycle
of human review management, making it easy to track progress and update
existing reviews without losing work.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
- Mark human review integration and QoL improvements as completed in claude_explain.md
- Update WHATS_NEXT.md to show all 4 phases of review interface work as done
- Enhance README.md Human Review Workflow section with comprehensive feature list
- Remove completed items from TODO lists and accurately reflect current capabilities

Documentation now reflects the evolution from basic web form to professional
review management system with status indicators, progress tracking, and
comprehensive user experience improvements.
@mattgodbolt mattgodbolt requested a review from Copilot June 5, 2025 20:05
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR implements review status indicators, progress tracking, and update functionality for the prompt testing framework by enhancing both the backend API and the frontend interface.

  • Adds a new API endpoint to fetch reviews filtered by prompt version.
  • Introduces CSS styling and JavaScript logic for review status indicators and dynamic progress tracking.
  • Updates documentation and README to reflect the new review management features.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
prompt_testing/web_review.py Added API route for retrieving reviews by prompt version.
prompt_testing/templates/review.html Integrated visual status indicators, progress tracking, and update functionality.
prompt_testing/WHATS_NEXT.md Updated next steps documentation to include new features.
prompt_testing/README.md Enhanced feature list to detail the new web review interface changes.
claude_explain.md Revised explanations to describe the enhancements in review management.

# Group reviews by case_id for easier frontend consumption
reviews_by_case = {}
for review in reviews:
reviews_by_case[review.case_id] = review.__dict__
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If there is a possibility of multiple reviews per case, this assignment will overwrite previous reviews. Consider grouping reviews per case in an array to avoid data loss.

Suggested change
reviews_by_case[review.case_id] = review.__dict__
if review.case_id not in reviews_by_case:
reviews_by_case[review.case_id] = []
reviews_by_case[review.case_id].append(review.__dict__)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Address Copilot feedback about line 238 direct assignment vs arrays. Added
comprehensive comment explaining this is an intentional design decision for
single-reviewer prompt iteration workflows rather than multi-reviewer research.

The design optimizes for:
- Simple binary reviewed/not-reviewed state
- Clear completion tracking without consensus complexity
- UI focused on iteration speed over comprehensive evaluation
- JSONL storage still preserves all reviews for future evolution
@mattgodbolt mattgodbolt merged commit 76f5219 into main Jun 5, 2025
1 check passed
@mattgodbolt mattgodbolt deleted the review-status-indicators branch June 5, 2025 20:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant