Can I use only LCOV files?

[moonkwoo]

Hello,

My application is based on python and I use pytest-cov to create report file.
The available formats of reports file are terminal, html, xml in pytest-cov.
(c.f. https://pytest-cov.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reporting.html)

Can I use not only LCOV files but also XML, HTML to send report file to coveralls?

[ruippeixotog]

I have the same question. I'm trying to migrate from Travis to GitHub Actions and I have a cobertura.xml file generated by sbt-scoverage but I can't seem to find a way to convert it to LCOV. Previously I used sbt-coveralls, but they don't support GitHub Actions and I'd rather use the officially supported action anyway.

Would it be a possibility to support some of the most common coverage formats?

[riquellopes]

Hi guys. I've the same problem with my python application. Do you've a solution to solve this?

[riquellopes]

Hello,

My application is based on python and I use pytest-cov to create report file.
The available formats of reports file are terminal, html, xml in pytest-cov.
(c.f. https://pytest-cov.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reporting.html)

Can I use not only LCOV files but also XML, HTML to send report file to coveralls?

Hi moonkwoo, to solve I used this tip: https://github.com/aodj/icelandreview/blob/master/.github/workflows/pythonpackage.yml#L30

[Rotendahl]

The solution provided by @riquellopes works.
However it does not run on forked pull requests like the official action.

A solution that either converts python-coverage to .lcov or extending the official action to support some other format is still needed.

[SVilgelm]

@nickmerwin Could you give us an example how to use the coverage repo generated by pytest-cov?
@coveralls

[SteadBytes]

@SVilgelm that output is not supported by this GitHub action (LCOV only) and requires using the coveralls python library instead which, as @Rotendahl pointed out, doesn't work on forked PRs.

[ruippeixotog]

@nickmerwin are there any plans from Coveralls to officially maintain and/or add new features to this, or was this just an experiment?

[DomAmato]

no update in months and limited functionality... kind of a shame since the github actions are nice but I guess for tests we can't really rely on this

[chrisjsewell]

Oh well looks like I'm ditching coveralls for codecov. It's a shame I like coveralls, but if forked PRs aren't supported with GitHub actions/pytest then its not viable for my, and I imagine lots of others, use cases

[AndreMiras]

I made it work and wrote an action for it https://github.com/marketplace/actions/coveralls-python
It's still early so the API may change, always keep an eye on the documentation is something breaks and keep me posted how it works or doesn't work for you