Skip to content

Conversation

@yottahmd
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@yottahmd has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f04786c and 3d0e9dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • internal/core/container.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/core/spec/builder.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/core/spec/builder_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/core/spec/definition.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/runtime/builtin/docker/client.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/runtime/builtin/docker/client_test.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/runtime/builtin/docker/config.go (1 hunks)
  • schemas/dag.schema.json (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch containerName

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@yottahmd yottahmd merged commit 5d90d27 into main Dec 20, 2025
5 checks passed
@yottahmd yottahmd deleted the containerName branch December 20, 2025 12:10
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 65.21739% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.89%. Comparing base (f04786c) to head (3d0e9dc).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/runtime/builtin/docker/client.go 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1496      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.91%   59.89%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         196      196              
  Lines       22013    22023      +10     
==========================================
  Hits        13190    13190              
- Misses       7409     7418       +9     
- Partials     1414     1415       +1     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
internal/core/container.go 55.55% <ø> (ø)
internal/core/spec/builder.go 68.41% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
internal/runtime/builtin/docker/config.go 90.62% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
internal/runtime/builtin/docker/client.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f04786c...3d0e9dc. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants