Added missing GROK model provider key initialization#296
Merged
Conversation
Merged
lalalune
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2026
Added missing GROK model provider key initialization
FranceFlapjack
pushed a commit
to FranceFlapjack/eliza
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2026
Added missing GROK model provider key initialization
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Relates to:
#295
Risks
Low: This change is low risk, as it only introduces a new case for an additional model provider in an existing switch statement.
Background
What does this PR do?
This PR adds initialization for the
GROKmodel provider key in thegetTokenForProviderfunction. Previously, the function did not handle theGROKmodel provider, potentially leading to issues if the provider was selected without a corresponding key.What kind of change is this?
GROK).Documentation changes needed?
Yes
Testing
Where should a reviewer start?
The review should focus on the
getTokenForProviderfunction in the relevant file, ensuring that the addedGROKcase aligns with the structure of other model provider cases.Detailed testing steps
ModelProviderName.GROKsuccessfully returns the appropriate API key fromcharacter.settings?.secrets?.GROK_API_KEYorsettings.GROK_API_KEY.Deploy Notes
No special deployment instructions.
Database changes
None.
Deployment instructions
Standard deployment steps apply.