Large http file download fails in 2.4.0 rc1

[bbx10]

Hardware

Hardware: ESP12
Core Version: 2.4.0 rc1

Description

Run FSBrowser example then upload 1 MByte file to SPIFFS. The ESP12 has 4MB Flash with 3MB for SPIFFS. The upload works fine.

The problem occurs when downloading the large file using curl/wget. The transfer aborts after a few hundreds of K bytes.

$ curl http://192.168.x.y/1MB.DAT >/dev/null
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
 36 1024k   36  376k    0     0  53976      0  0:00:19  0:00:07  0:00:12 45560
curl: (18) transfer closed with 663240 bytes remaining to read

The last commit where large file download works is 2aeac91. The following commits modify WiFiClient.cpp and .h but the code is way over my head.

[igrr]

Thanks for pointing this out. WiFiClient::write now times out after _timeout milliseconds (which defaults to 5000), and this doesn't depend on the amount of data written. I suppose in ESP8266WebServer we need to increase this timeout depending on data length.

[JamesGKent]

i have to admit that i haven't looked at the code (and would probably be over my head) but assuming this writes in chunks would it not make more sense to reset the timeout each time a chunk is written successfully? that way the timeout setting would still have meaning, but would allow normal writes to succeed. Just a thought

[igrr]

Splitting into chunks currently happens inside WiFiClient::write now, but the timeout is applied to the whole write operation. Turning it into a per-chunk timeout does make sense, i guess.

[bbx10]

WiFiClient::write(Stream& stream) is passed the 1MB file stream so the write() timeout has to cover the entire file transfer.

[JamesGKent]

@bbx10 you say has to, but that doesn't make sense, if you have a large file it will always time out given the limitations of the ESP with regards to throughput, it makes more sense to timeout after a period of inactivity which i think is more logical to think of each chunk as an activity rather than the whole write. that way if the connection is terminated early, the write will timeout after 5 seconds from the last successful chunk.

[igrr]

Unfortunately the other wifi libraries (WiFi shield library and WiFi101 library) don't help answer the question how Stream::_timeout should be applied to write operation. Both libraries delegate timeout handling to the underlying firmware, so _timeout isn't actually used for writes.

Personally i think that being able to specify timeouts for writes is useful. The proper solution would probably be to define per-chunk (or per-byte) timeout and the total timeout, similar to the way serial timeouts are defined in WinAPI. But that wouldn't fit into Stream::setTimeout idiom.

[bbx10]

@JamesGKent I am describing how the code works right now. The default 5 second timeout IS terminating the file xfer. I confirmed this by increasing it to 20 seconds and observing the file xfer finished. I will let @igrr decide how to fix.

[igrr]

Fixed in d6f1f0d. Timeout now happens if no data was sent for _timeout milliseconds.

[bbx10]

I confirmed d6f1f0d fixes the reported bug.