openthread: Style guide and language conformance #5046
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3 tasks
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
WalkthroughThe documentation for the OpenThread component was revised for improved clarity and technical accuracy. Wording was adjusted to better explain Thread's role, clarify hardware requirements, and refine descriptions of configuration options, without changing any underlying instructions or technical content. Changes
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/openthread.rst (3)
8-8: Use full forms and consistent hyphenation for readabilityAvoid contractions in technical docs and keep compound adjectives consistently hyphenated.
-`Thread <https://www.threadgroup.org>`__ is a low-power mesh networking standard for IoT devices. The low-power aspect is important for battery-powered smart home devices. It’s also low-bandwidth, making it ideal for applications that don’t send a lot of data, like switches or motion sensors. +`Thread <https://www.threadgroup.org>`__ is a low-power, mesh-networking standard for IoT devices. The low-power aspect is important for battery-powered, smart-home devices. It is also low-bandwidth, making it ideal for applications that do not send a lot of data, such as switches or motion sensors.
12-12: Link first mention of 6LoWPAN for quick contextReaders unfamiliar with 6LoWPAN benefit from an inline reference.
- It supports sending the state of sensors and binary sensors to Home Assistant via 6LoWPAN packets. + It supports sending the state of sensors and binary sensors to Home Assistant via `6LoWPAN <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/documents/>`__ packets.
68-68: Grammar tweak in TLV sentenceRemove the unnecessary article and tighten wording.
-It's also possible to supply the entire Operational Dataset as a hex-encoded TLVs from the Thread information in Home Assistant. The individual values will be automatically extracted from it. +It is also possible to supply the entire Operational Dataset as hex-encoded TLVs obtained from the Thread information in Home Assistant. The individual values will be extracted automatically.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/openthread.rst(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**`: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
**: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
components/openthread.rst
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: jesserockz
PR: esphome/esphome-docs#4865
File: .github/workflows/needs-docs.yml:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-01T03:29:47.922Z
Learning: In the esphome-docs repository, the "current" label is automatically added by a bot to pull requests, making it a reliable indicator for the target branch.
components/openthread.rst (1)
Learnt from: jesserockz
PR: esphome/esphome-docs#4901
File: changelog/2025.4.0.rst:124-126
Timestamp: 2025-05-12T00:02:50.869Z
Learning: In the ESPHome changelog structure, the "All changes" section should have the `:open:` attribute to be expanded by default, but the "Dependency Changes" section should NOT have this attribute as it should remain collapsed by default.
cretep
force-pushed
the
thread-tidy-current
branch
from
d0f2a6c to
2303558
Compare
|
Hmm, coderabbitai's "Avoid contractions" comment directly contradicts Home Assistant's official choice of style guide which says to Use contractions. Hey ho. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
Minor gramatical and stylistic changes with aim to meet General style guide. I've used the language of capabilities and features over permissions ("allow") since that seems more friendly, clear, and relevant. Also, I've expanded on what "dataset TLVs" are, as per OpenThread doc language, since I was confused at first.
(Rebase of #4996 which was on
nextbranch.)Checklist:
I am merging into
nextbecause this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
currentbecause this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/components/index.rstwhen creating new documents for new components or cookbook.