interop explainers #825
interop explainers #825
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the OP Stack framework's interoperability by introducing new metadata for cross-chain messaging and comprehensive guides on interoperability. Additionally, new vocabulary terms relevant to blockchain technology have been incorporated. These updates aim to improve documentation and user understanding of cross-chain functionalities while maintaining the existing structure. Changes
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (1)
Additional context usedPath-based instructions (1)
LanguageTool
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (7)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/xchain-message.mdx (3)
21-21: Use Proper Title Case for Headers.Ensure that the header "How It Works" uses proper title case.
- ## How It Works + ## How it Works
32-32: Clarify the example description.The sentence could be clearer by specifying what
Ox123refers to.- In the example above, `Ox123` sends 1 OP from OP Mainnet to Base, but this applies to any asset using the SuperchainERC20 token standard. + In the example above, the address `Ox123` sends 1 OP from OP Mainnet to Base, but this applies to any asset using the SuperchainERC20 token standard.
36-36: Use Proper Title Case for Headers.Ensure that the header "Next Steps" uses proper title case.
- ## Next Steps + ## Next stepspages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (4)
29-29: Simplify phrasing for conciseness.Consider removing "of" for a more concise sentence.
- The fault proof guarantees that all of the cross chain messages are accounted for from the perspective of handling withdrawals through the bridge to L1. + The fault proof guarantees that all cross chain messages are accounted for from the perspective of handling withdrawals through the bridge to L1.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~29-~29: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ually. The fault proof guarantees that all of the cross chain messages are accounted for ...(ALL_OF_THE)
35-35: Simplify phrasing for conciseness.Consider removing "of" for a more concise sentence.
- it is impossible for a chain to know of all of the other chains that depend on it. + it is impossible for a chain to know all the other chains that depend on it.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~35-~35: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...it is impossible for a chain to know of all of the other chains that depend on it. ## Con...(ALL_OF_THE)
64-64: Use "different from" instead of "different than"."Different from" is more widely accepted in formal writing.
- ie batch submit something different than what they gossip over the p2p network. + ie batch submit something different from what they gossip over the p2p network.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~64-~64: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...h other if they are accepting executing messages where the initiating message is unsafe....(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~64-~64: Did you mean ‘different from’? ‘Different than’ is often considered colloquial style.
Context: ...ta, ie batch submit something different than what they gossip over the p2p network. ...(DIFFERENT_THAN)
67-67: Rephrase for conciseness.Rephrase the sentence for a more concise expression.
- it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom gas paying token or have a large execution gas limit. + they might use Plasma for data availability, a custom gas-paying token, or have a large execution gas limit.Tools
LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~67-~67: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...n fungible blockspace? Chains that have non fungible blockspace are chains that have differe...(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_FUNGIBLE)
[style] ~67-~67: For conciseness, try rephrasing this sentence.
Context: ...e chains that have different features - it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom ...(MAY_MIGHT_BE)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/xchain-message.mdx (1)
32-32: Clarify example for broader applicability.Consider rephrasing to emphasize the general applicability of the example.
- In the example above, `Ox123` sends 1 OP from OP Mainnet to Base, but this applies to any asset using the SuperchainERC20 token standard. + For instance, `Ox123` sends 1 OP from OP Mainnet to Base; however, this process applies to any asset using the SuperchainERC20 token standard.pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (1)
1-12: Metadata is well-structured.The metadata is correctly formatted and adheres to the guidelines.
Improve clarity in the introduction.
Consider rephrasing for better flow and clarity.
- Interoperability is the ability for a blockchain to easily read the state of another blockchain. + Interoperability is the capability of a blockchain to seamlessly read the state of another blockchain.
Co-authored-by: soyboy <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (7)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (7)
11-16: Clarify introduction and benefits list.The introduction is clear, but consider rephrasing for conciseness and clarity. Use the Oxford comma in the benefits list.
- * fungible and portable assets and liquidity - * lower fees and lower latency - * less fragmentation across the Superchain + * fungible, portable assets, and liquidity + * lower fees, and lower latency + * less fragmentation across the Superchain
18-24: Clarify message passing and token specification.The section is informative but could benefit from clearer explanations. Ensure technical terms are well-defined for readers unfamiliar with the topic.
29-29: Consider concise phrasing.Remove "of" for a more concise expression.
- The fault proof guarantees that all of the cross chain messages are accounted for + The fault proof guarantees that all cross chain messages are accounted forTools
LanguageTool
[style] ~29-~29: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ually. The fault proof guarantees that all of the cross chain messages are accounted for ...(ALL_OF_THE)
35-35: Consider concise phrasing.Remove "of" for a more concise expression.
- it is impossible for a chain to know of all of the other chains that depend on it. + it is impossible for a chain to know all the other chains that depend on it.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~35-~35: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...it is impossible for a chain to know of all of the other chains that depend on it. ## Con...(ALL_OF_THE)
37-40: Clarify future infrastructure requirements.Ensure that the future tense is used consistently when discussing future developments.
- In the future, this service will rely on the P2P network and cryptographic schemes for validating cross chain messages, instead of RPCs. + This service will, in the future, rely on the P2P network and cryptographic schemes for validating cross chain messages, instead of RPCs.
54-55: Consider future adoption of EIP-7547.Ensure clarity in discussing potential future developments.
67-67: Consider concise phrasing.Rephrase for conciseness.
- it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom gas paying token or have a large execution gas limit. + they might use Plasma for data availability, a custom gas-paying token, or have a large execution gas limit.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~67-~67: For conciseness, try rephrasing this sentence.
Context: ...e chains that have different features - it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom ...(MAY_MIGHT_BE)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (10)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/cross-chain-message.mdx (4)
12-12: Add missing article.Consider adding "a" before "cross-chain message" for grammatical correctness.
- A cross-chain message applies to any message sent across chain. + A cross-chain message applies to any message sent across a chain.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...sage applies to any message sent across chain. This applies to asset transfers using ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)
15-15: Add missing article.Consider adding "the" before "destination chain" for grammatical correctness.
- **Second transaction:** is submitted to a destination chain, + **Second transaction:** is submitted to the destination chain,Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: Possible missing article found.
Context: ... consumed on a destination chain. * Second transaction: is submitted to a destin...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
23-26: Clarify the explanation.Consider rephrasing for clarity and to ensure the explanation is easily understood.
- To send a cross-chain message on the Superchain using native OP Stack interoperability, these two aspects must be in place: + To send a cross-chain message on the Superchain using native OP Stack interoperability, ensure the following:
36-38: Ensure consistent link formatting.Check that all links are formatted consistently and use sentence case for descriptions.
- * More questions? Check out the FAQ section in the [OP Stack's Native Interop Explainer](explainer#faqs) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes). + * More questions? Check out the FAQ section in the [OP Stack's native interop explainer](explainer#faqs) or this [interop design video walk-through](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (6)
11-12: Clarify interoperability benefits.Rephrase for clarity and to highlight the benefits more effectively.
- Native OP Stack interoperability provides the ability to read messages and transfer assets across the Superchain (without having to go through L1) via secure message passing. + Native OP Stack interoperability enables reading messages and transferring assets across the Superchain without routing through L1, using secure message passing.
26-29: Avoid redundancy and improve clarity.Rephrase to avoid redundancy and improve clarity.
- Low latency interoperability allows for horizontally scalable blockchains, a key feature of the Superchain. With native interop, latency can be low (~2 seconds) by optimistically accepting cross chain messages. + Low latency interoperability enables horizontally scalable blockchains, a key feature of the Superchain. Native interop achieves low latency (~2 seconds) by optimistically accepting cross-chain messages.Tools
LanguageTool
[grammar] ~26-~26: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably use “Low Latency” only once.
Context: ...op of the message passing protocol. ## Low Latency Low latency interoperability allows for horizontall...(PHRASE_REPETITION)
[style] ~29-~29: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ually. The fault proof guarantees that all of the cross chain messages are accounted for ...(ALL_OF_THE)
32-35: Clarify dependency explanation.Rephrase for clarity and to ensure the explanation is concise.
- It is permissionless to define a dependency on a chain, so chain operators will be able to choose which chains their chains depend on, and it is not a requirement that chains are in each other's dependency set. + Defining a dependency on a chain is permissionless, allowing chain operators to choose dependencies without requiring mutual inclusion in each other's dependency set.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~35-~35: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...it is impossible for a chain to know of all of the other chains that depend on it. ## Con...(ALL_OF_THE)
37-41: Clarify infrastructure requirements.Rephrase for clarity and to ensure the explanation is concise.
- Chain operators will need to run additional infrastructure to be part of the interoperable set. - The Superchain-backend `microservice` will be a requirement for running an OP Stack chain that has interop enabled. + Chain operators must run additional infrastructure to join the interoperable set. + The Superchain-backend `microservice` is required for running an OP Stack chain with interop enabled.
55-55: Add missing comma for clarity.Add a comma before "and" to separate independent clauses.
- It takes about 15 minutes for an L1 block to finalize, and higher throughput OP Stack chains like Base and OP Mainnet submit a batch about every 5 minutes. + It takes about 15 minutes for an L1 block to finalize, and higher throughput OP Stack chains, like Base and OP Mainnet, submit a batch about every 5 minutes.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~55-~55: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...speed. The L2 data must be submitted to L1 and then the L1 block containing the tr...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
69-69: Clarify trust model explanation.Rephrase for clarity and to ensure the explanation is concise.
- Sequencers only have to trust each other, if they are accepting executing messages where the initiating message is unsafe. + Sequencers only need to trust each other when accepting executing messages with unsafe initiating messages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/cross-chain-message.mdx (1)
32-36: Content is clear, consider adding Oxford comma for consistency.The section is clear and informative. Consider adding an Oxford comma for consistency.
Use this diff for consistency:
* More questions? Check out the FAQ section in the [OP Stack's Native Interop Explainer](explainer#faqs) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes). +* More questions? Check out the FAQ section in the [OP Stack's Native Interop Explainer](explainer#faqs), or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (4)
12-17: Content is clear, consider adding Oxford comma for consistency.The section is clear and informative. Consider adding an Oxford comma for consistency.
Use this diff for consistency:
* fungible and portable assets and liquidity +* fungible, and portable assets and liquidity
19-25: Content is clear, consider rephrasing for conciseness.The section is clear and informative. Consider rephrasing for conciseness.
Use this diff for conciseness:
This means ETH and ERC-20s can seamlessly and securely move across L2s, and intent-based protocols, such as bridges, can build better experiences on top of the message passing protocol. +This means ETH and ERC-20s can seamlessly and securely move across L2s. Intent-based protocols, such as bridges, can build better experiences on top of the message passing protocol.
32-36: Content is clear, consider rephrasing for conciseness.The section is clear and informative. Consider rephrasing for conciseness.
Use this diff for conciseness:
- it is impossible for a chain to know of all of the other chains that depend on it. + it is impossible for a chain to know all the other chains that depend on it.Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~36-~36: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...it is impossible for a chain to know of all of the other chains that depend on it. ## Con...(ALL_OF_THE)
38-51: Content is clear, consider adding Oxford comma for consistency.The sections are clear and informative. Consider adding an Oxford comma for consistency.
Use this diff for consistency:
* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes). +* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](cross-chain-message), or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).
2 interop explainers