Skip to content

Conversation

@rmonnet
Copy link
Contributor

@rmonnet rmonnet commented Jan 16, 2026

This exercise escaped during the Peer Review and is using testing.expect(t, slice.equal(...)) instead of
the agreed upon pattern expect_slice_equals(t, ...) making error messages less than informative.

This exercise escaped during the Peer Review and is using
`testing.expect(t, slice.equal(...))` instead of
the agreed upon pattern `expect_slice_equals(t, ...)` making
error messages less than informative.
@rmonnet rmonnet requested a review from glennj January 16, 2026 19:44
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR touches files which potentially affect the outcome of the tests of an exercise. This will cause all students' solutions to affected exercises to be re-tested.

If this PR does not affect the result of the test (or, for example, adds an edge case that is not worth rerunning all tests for), please add the following to the merge-commit message which will stops student's tests from re-running. Please copy-paste to avoid typos.

[no important files changed]

For more information, refer to the documentation. If you are unsure whether to add the message or not, please ping @exercism/maintainers-admin in a comment. Thank you!

@glennj glennj merged commit 02fc784 into exercism:main Jan 16, 2026
4 checks passed
rmonnet added a commit to rmonnet/exercism-odin that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2026
After PR exercism#161, I went through all the published exercises and
checked if any other was using the 'slice.equal()' to compare
expected vs result. I found another two and confirmed that
the failed test report were confusing ('expected true but got
 false').
glennj pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2026
After PR #161, I went through all the published exercises and
checked if any other was using the 'slice.equal()' to compare
expected vs result. I found another two and confirmed that
the failed test report were confusing ('expected true but got
 false').
@rmonnet rmonnet added x:action/improve Improve existing functionality/content x:type/content Work on content (e.g. exercises, concepts) labels Jan 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

x:action/improve Improve existing functionality/content x:type/content Work on content (e.g. exercises, concepts)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants