Patch WAL dedupe when search is disabled#968
Merged
annanay25 merged 4 commits intografana:mainfrom Sep 21, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Annanay <annanayagarwal@gmail.com>
Collaborator
I'm fine with this fix, but should we also not write an empty entry? Doesn't that mean we're incurring some write penalties even with search disabled? |
Contributor
Author
So we are basically writing zero length objects to the search data file, which I don't think is costly. The solution to this is to have sprinkled all over the ingester code (CutCompleteTraces, CompleteBlock, Flush, ... etc). Not sure if we want that, but open to suggestions. |
joe-elliott
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2021
Signed-off-by: Annanay <annanayagarwal@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does:
Fixes an issue with WAL dedupe (SearchDataCombiner) when search is disabled. This happens because we still create search WAL files on the ingester with empty entries.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #967. Part of #932
Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdupdated - the order of entries should be[CHANGE],[FEATURE],[ENHANCEMENT],[BUGFIX]