Skip to content

Call for maintainers #439

Open
Open
@michaelpj

Description

@michaelpj
Collaborator

These packages could do with more maintainers! At the moment I think I am the most active maintainer, but it would be great to have more. It would be especially good to have someone take an interest in lsp-test, which I've barely touched.

Activity

pinned this issue on Jun 20, 2022
thomasjm

thomasjm commented on Jun 30, 2022

@thomasjm
Collaborator

@michaelpj I could help maintain if you like. I'm tracking down a bug in lsp-test this very moment...

michaelpj

michaelpj commented on Jun 30, 2022

@michaelpj
CollaboratorAuthor

That would be great! I'd encourage you to dive into lsp-test. I'll tag you if I want reviews or similar :)

thomasjm

thomasjm commented on Jun 30, 2022

@thomasjm
Collaborator

Got a simple one for you here: #443

This was the first obstacle I encountered trying to run lsp-test against rust-analyzer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @thomasjm@michaelpj

        Issue actions

          Call for maintainers · Issue #439 · haskell/lsp