Skip to content

✨ Enable transit encryption to S3 bucket#4676

Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
giantswarm:s3-transit-encryption
Dec 13, 2023
Merged

✨ Enable transit encryption to S3 bucket#4676
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
giantswarm:s3-transit-encryption

Conversation

@fiunchinho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fiunchinho fiunchinho commented Dec 5, 2023

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emojis
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

Enable transit encryption on S3 buckets

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 5, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from faiq and vincepri December 5, 2023 11:57
@fiunchinho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

fiunchinho commented Dec 5, 2023

/test all

@fiunchinho fiunchinho mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2023
Closed
3 tasks
@fiunchinho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

fiunchinho commented Dec 5, 2023

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 5, 2023

@fiunchinho: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-clusterclass
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance-with-ci-artifacts
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-gc
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-testing

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify
Details

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@fiunchinho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

fiunchinho commented Dec 5, 2023

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@fiunchinho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

fiunchinho commented Dec 5, 2023

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@fiunchinho fiunchinho marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2023 16:52
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 5, 2023
@faiq
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

faiq commented Dec 5, 2023

Does this require any changes for IAM permissions on the roles

@fiunchinho
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

fiunchinho commented Dec 11, 2023

Does this require any changes for IAM permissions on the roles

Official docs don't mention anything about IAM so I'd say no, it doesn't require any changes on IAM permissions.

AndiDog
AndiDog reviewed Dec 11, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AndiDog AndiDog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 11, 2023
@faiq
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

faiq commented Dec 11, 2023

/lgtm

richardcase
richardcase reviewed Dec 13, 2023
View reviewed changes
@richardcase
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

richardcase commented Dec 13, 2023

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7be1c77 into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 13, 2023
@AndiDog AndiDog mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@richardcase richardcase richardcase left review comments

@AndiDog AndiDog AndiDog left review comments

@faiq faiq Awaiting requested review from faiq

@vincepri vincepri Awaiting requested review from vincepri

@dlipovetsky dlipovetsky Awaiting requested review from dlipovetsky

@luthermonson luthermonson Awaiting requested review from luthermonson

Assignees

@AndiDog AndiDog

@faiq faiq

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fiunchinho @k8s-ci-robot @faiq @richardcase @AndiDog