🐛 Fixed RosaMachinePool typo.

[tinaafitz]

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR is fixing a RosaMchinePoolReady typo.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Discovered issue while working on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-16063

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• includes emojis
• adds unit tests
• adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

Fixed RosaMachinePool typo.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: tinaafitz / name: Tina Fitzgerald (fcbd61e)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @tinaafitz. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[tinaafitz]

@serngawy, Please review.

[serngawy]

Thanks Tina , sounds good please add 🐛 to the PR title so it can pass the verify job

[nrb]

/ok-to-test

[nrb]

/ok-to-test

[nrb]

apidiff is failing because a string value for a condition type was changed. As long as you're ok with that @serngawy, then that's nothing to worry about.

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test

Was out of capacity at the time.

[serngawy]

apidiff is failing because a string value for a condition type was changed. As long as you're ok with that @serngawy, then that's nothing to worry about.

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test

Was out of capacity at the time.

Yes, its okay better to fix typo

[tinaafitz]

/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

@tinaafitz: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main	fcbd61e	link	false	/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[nrb]

@tinaafitz the API diff test won't pass since the strings are new values. That tests exists to give us a heads up that the API's changing and could lead to compatibility issues.

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nrb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [nrb]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tinaafitz]

Thanks, @nrb. That makes sense.