fix path for canary by header + add e2e#365
fix path for canary by header + add e2e#365k8s-ci-robot merged 8 commits intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Hi @jgreeer. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@jgreer could you add an integration test |
|
/ok-to-test |
|
/approve |
| neverRule := gatewayv1.HTTPRouteRule{ | ||
| Matches: []gatewayv1.HTTPRouteMatch{neverMatch}, | ||
| BackendRefs: []gatewayv1.HTTPBackendRef{nonCanaryBackendCopy}, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this logic is repeated on lines 142-149. We can extract this into a helper function to reduce the size of canaryFeature function which is already quite long.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bexxmodd, jgreeer, Stevenjin8 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@bexxmodd can you lgtm |
|
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?