Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
161 lines (111 loc) · 9.39 KB

File metadata and controls

161 lines (111 loc) · 9.39 KB

Meta Llama: Guardrails and Fix Patterns

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of LLM_Providers.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

This page gives an operational checklist for Meta Llama based assistants inside RAG and agent stacks. It maps the usual failure modes to concrete WFGY fixes and acceptance targets.

Acceptance targets

  • ΔS(question, retrieved_context) ≤ 0.45
  • Coverage of retrieved vs target section ≥ 0.70
  • λ_observe stays convergent across 3 paraphrases
  • E_resonance flat on long windows

Common failure patterns seen with Llama setups

  1. Plausible but wrong answers even when chunks look fine
    Map to: Interpretation Collapse and Hallucination & Chunk Drift.
    Check also Embedding ≠ Semantic and the Retrieval Playbook.

  2. Degradation in long dialogs or large context
    Map to: Context Drift and Entropy Collapse.

  3. Role loss after tool calls or agent hops
    Map to: Multi-Agent Problems and deep dive Role Drift.

  4. Overconfident answers without citations
    Map to: Bluffing / Overconfidence. Enforce traceable schemas with Retrieval Traceability and Data Contracts.

  5. Hybrid retrieval oscillation, high similarity but wrong meaning
    Map to: Embedding ≠ Semantic and Rerankers. Tune using the Retrieval Playbook.

  6. Cross-source merging and leakage
    Map to: Symbolic Constraint Unlock pattern
    SCU pattern with strict Data Contracts.

  7. Tokenizer or locale mismatch on non-English corpora
    Map to: Multilingual Guide and re-probe with Embedding ≠ Semantic.


WFGY repair map for Llama


Quick triage steps

  1. Probe ΔS(question, retrieved_context). If ≥ 0.60 open:
    Embedding ≠ Semantic and Hallucination.

  2. Vary k in {5, 10, 20} and chart ΔS vs k. Flat-high curve points to index or metric mismatch
    Retrieval Playbook.

  3. If chunks are correct but logic is wrong, mark λ at reasoning and apply BBCR + BBAM
    Interpretation Collapse and Logic Collapse.

  4. For long dialogs, verify joins with ΔS ≤ 0.50 and clamp variance
    Context Drift and Entropy Collapse.

  5. If sources bleed, enforce SCU and per-section fences
    SCU pattern and Retrieval Traceability.


Minimal safe prompt you can paste


I uploaded TXT OS. Read WFGY formulas and Problem Map pages.
My stack runs on Meta Llama.

symptom: \[describe]
traces: \[ΔS probes, λ states, short logs]

Tell me:

1. the failing layer and why,
2. the exact WFGY page to open next,
3. the minimal steps to push ΔS ≤ 0.45 with convergent λ,
4. how to verify the fix with a reproducible test.


Escalation and ops


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Layer Page What it’s for
⭐ Proof WFGY Recognition Map External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
⚙️ Engine WFGY 1.0 Original PDF tension engine and early logic sketch (legacy reference)
⚙️ Engine WFGY 2.0 Production tension kernel for RAG and agent systems
⚙️ Engine WFGY 3.0 TXT based Singularity tension engine (131 S class set)
🗺️ Map Problem Map 1.0 Flagship 16 problem RAG failure taxonomy and fix map
🗺️ Map Problem Map 2.0 Global Debug Card for RAG and agent pipeline diagnosis
🗺️ Map Problem Map 3.0 Global AI troubleshooting atlas and failure pattern map
🧰 App TXT OS .txt semantic OS with fast bootstrap
🧰 App Blah Blah Blah Abstract and paradox Q&A built on TXT OS
🧰 App Blur Blur Blur Text to image generation with semantic control
🏡 Onboarding Starter Village Guided entry point for new users

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.
GitHub Repo stars