Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
162 lines (119 loc) · 9.91 KB

File metadata and controls

162 lines (119 loc) · 9.91 KB

Weaviate: Guardrails and Fix Patterns

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of VectorDBs_and_Stores.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

A compact field guide to stabilize Weaviate when your RAG or agent stack loses accuracy. Use the checks below to localize the failure, then jump to the exact WFGY fix page.

Open these first

Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Measure ΔS

    • Compute ΔS(question, retrieved) and ΔS(retrieved, expected anchor).
    • Targets: stable < 0.45, transitional 0.40–0.60, risk ≥ 0.60.
  2. Probe with λ_observe

    • Try k in {5, 10, 20}. Flat high curve suggests metric or index mismatch.
    • Reorder prompt headers. If ΔS spikes, fix schema or anchors.
  3. Apply the module

    • Retrieval drift → BBMC plus Data Contracts.
    • Reasoning collapse → BBCR bridge plus BBAM variance clamp.
    • Dead ends in long runs → BBPF alternate path.
  4. Verify

    • Coverage to target section ≥ 0.70.
    • λ convergent across three paraphrases and two seeds.

Typical breakpoints and the right fix

  • Metric mismatch

    • Corpus built with cosine but class uses dot or L2. Normalization tests raise ΔS while recall looks fine.
    • Action: rebuild class with correct distance or normalize embeddings at write and query. See Embedding ≠ Semantic and Retrieval Playbook.
  • Dimension or encoder swap

    • Import accepts new vectors then recall collapses for only the new span.
    • Action: lock encoder version in the schema via a data contract, re-index the affected classes. See Data Contracts.
  • HNSW tuning traps

    • efSearch too low for your k, or M too small for dense corpora. Symptoms are plateaued recall and unstable top-k ordering.
    • Action: raise efSearch to 2–4×k, validate with reranker sandwiched on top. See Rerankers and Retrieval Playbook.
  • Shard or replica consistency

    • Some queries never surface fresh writes. Multi-tenant classes or replicas returning stale reads.
    • Action: align consistency level during validation, confirm write-ack before eval. See Live Monitoring for RAG.
  • Hybrid search weighting

    • BM25 plus vector performs worse than vector alone. Query template or HyDE text dominates vector term.
    • Action: run the split test. If the hybrid flip is the cause, re-balance weights and clean prompt glue. See Query Parsing Split.
  • Vectorstore fragmentation

    • Multiple classes with near-duplicate schemas. Coverage drops while ΔS stays flat high across k.
    • Action: merge or route by class key, then rebuild a single authoritative index. See Vectorstore Fragmentation.
  • Tokenization and filter mismatch

    • Filters on properties return empty or unstable results. Analyzer not aligned with corpus language or case rules.
    • Action: lock analyzers in a data contract and re-ingest with normalized fields. See Data Contracts.
  • Batch import and boot order

    • First production call after deploy fails or returns zero results although objects exist.
    • Action: enforce bootstrap fence and idempotent batcher. See Debug Playbook.

Observability probes

  • k-sweep curve: run k in 5, 10, 20 and plot ΔS. A flat high curve means metric or class routing fault.
  • Anchor control: compare ΔS against a golden anchor set for one class. If only a class fails, route or rebuild.
  • Hybrid toggle: run vector only and hybrid with equal weight. If hybrid degrades, fix query split or weight.
  • Reranker audit: with a strong reranker, recall should improve monotonically while ΔS falls. If not, rebuild index.

Escalate when

  • ΔS stays above 0.60 for the golden questions after metric and efSearch corrections.
  • Coverage cannot reach 0.70 even with a reranker and clean anchors.
  • Fresh writes are invisible for more than one minute under your consistency setting.

Open:

Copy-paste prompt for your AI


I uploaded TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map files.

Target system: Weaviate.

* symptom: \[brief]
* traces: ΔS(question,retrieved)=..., ΔS(retrieved,anchor)=..., λ states
* index: \[class name, distance metric, efSearch, M, shards, replicas]
* encoder: \[model, dim, normalization, version]

Tell me:

1. which layer is failing and why,
2. which exact fix page to open from this repo,
3. minimal steps to push ΔS ≤ 0.45 and keep λ convergent,
4. how to verify with a reproducible test.

Use BBMC/BBPF/BBCR/BBAM when relevant.


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Layer Page What it’s for
⭐ Proof WFGY Recognition Map External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
⚙️ Engine WFGY 1.0 Original PDF tension engine and early logic sketch (legacy reference)
⚙️ Engine WFGY 2.0 Production tension kernel for RAG and agent systems
⚙️ Engine WFGY 3.0 TXT based Singularity tension engine (131 S class set)
🗺️ Map Problem Map 1.0 Flagship 16 problem RAG failure taxonomy and fix map
🗺️ Map Problem Map 2.0 Global Debug Card for RAG and agent pipeline diagnosis
🗺️ Map Problem Map 3.0 Global AI troubleshooting atlas and failure pattern map
🧰 App TXT OS .txt semantic OS with fast bootstrap
🧰 App Blah Blah Blah Abstract and paradox Q&A built on TXT OS
🧰 App Blur Blur Blur Text to image generation with semantic control
🏡 Onboarding Starter Village Guided entry point for new users

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.
GitHub Repo stars