Skip to content

Ignore 3.0 branch for breaking changes check #18030

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

andrross
Copy link
Member

We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for
now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <[email protected]>
@andrross andrross merged commit 29585ef into opensearch-project:main Apr 22, 2025
34 of 35 checks passed
@andrross andrross deleted the ignore-3.0-breaking-changes branch April 22, 2025 18:52
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for
now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 29585ef)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
jed326 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for
now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.


(cherry picked from commit 29585ef)

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
x-INFiN1TY-x pushed a commit to x-INFiN1TY-x/OpenSearch_Local that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2025
We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for
now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tanishq Ranjan <[email protected]>
prudhvigodithi pushed a commit to prudhvigodithi/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
… (opensearch-project#18033)

We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for
now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.

(cherry picked from commit 29585ef)

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Prudhvi Godithi <[email protected]>
Harsh-87 pushed a commit to Harsh-87/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for
now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Kothari <[email protected]>
Harsh-87 pushed a commit to Harsh-87/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
We'll need to come back and update this after the 3.0 release but for
now we should not be enforcing breaking changes against 3.0.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Ross <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Kothari <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants