Skip to content

Conversation

rexagod
Copy link
Member

@rexagod rexagod commented Sep 6, 2021

Fix breadcrumbs that showed OCS instead of ODF during BackingStore
creation and change OpenShift Data Foundation Operator under Bucket
Class Creation Page to OpenShift Data Foundation.

Before

2021-09-09-163404_2560x1440_scrot

After

2021-09-09-163219_2560x1440_scrot

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 6, 2021

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 6, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 6, 2021

@rexagod: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2001604, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2001604: Create BackingStore under ODF instead of OCS

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 6, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bipuladh and shyRozen September 6, 2021 22:47
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin label Sep 6, 2021
@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Sep 6, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 6, 2021

@rexagod: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2001604, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Sep 6, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 6, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 6, 2021

@rexagod: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2001604, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 6, 2021
@rexagod rexagod marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2021 07:13
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 8, 2021
@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Sep 8, 2021

/test ceph-storage-plugin

1 similar comment
@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Sep 8, 2021

/test ceph-storage-plugin

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

bipuladh commented Sep 9, 2021

/test frontend

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2021

@rexagod: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2001604, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

Bug 2001604: Create BackingStore under ODF instead of OCS

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rexagod rexagod changed the title Bug 2001604: Create BackingStore under ODF instead of OCS Bug 2001604: Bug 2001604: BreadCrumbs and OCS/ODF naming fixes Sep 9, 2021
@rexagod rexagod changed the title Bug 2001604: Bug 2001604: BreadCrumbs and OCS/ODF naming fixes Bug 2001604: BreadCrumbs and OCS/ODF naming fixes Sep 9, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated label Sep 9, 2021
@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

18 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 20, 2021
BreadCrumbs and OCS/ODF naming fixes for BucketClass, BackingStore, and
NamespaceStore.
@rexagod
Copy link
Member Author

rexagod commented Sep 20, 2021

Commited i18n files, please tag. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@bipuladh bipuladh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 21, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bipuladh, rexagod

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5608960 into openshift:master Sep 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 21, 2021

@rexagod: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2001760 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2001760: BreadCrumbs and OCS/ODF naming fixes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.10 milestone Sep 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin kind/i18n Indicates issue or PR relates to internationalization or has content that needs to be translated lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants