Skip to content

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #8085

/assign yaacov

@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Feb 9, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 9, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, yaacov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 9, 2021
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Feb 9, 2021

/retitle [release-4.7] Bug 1926830: Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.7] Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs [release-4.7] Bug 1926830: Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs Feb 9, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 9, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1926830, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1926830 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.8.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1926830: Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Feb 9, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

1 similar comment
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Feb 9, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 9, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1926830, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1926835 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1926835 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 9, 2021
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Feb 9, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 9, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1926830, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1926835 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1926835 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Feb 9, 2021

/retitle [release-4.7] Bug 1926830: [CI][e2e] Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.7] Bug 1926830: Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs [release-4.7] Bug 1926830: [CI][e2e] Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs Feb 9, 2021
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
KUBEVIRT_VERSION=$(curl -s https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/releases/latest | grep -o "v[0-9]\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we lock KUBEVIRT_VERSION as well?

@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Feb 24, 2021

/hold
Waiting for #8109 (comment) to be addressed

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 24, 2021
@yaacov
Copy link
Member

yaacov commented Feb 25, 2021

@mrunalp hi, I can't edit this PP (it's automated) so I'm moving this to a new PR with the fix @spadgett request

#8245

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yaacov: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

@mrunalp hi, I can't edit this PP (it's automated) so I'm moving this to a new PR with the fix @spadgett request

#8245

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1926830. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1926830: [CI][e2e] Add storage.bind.immediate.requested annotation to golden image dvs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.7.z milestone Mar 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/kubevirt Related to kubevirt-plugin do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants