Skip to content

Conversation

rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor

@rhrmo rhrmo commented Sep 9, 2025

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/STOR-2600

/cc @openshift/storage
/cc @openshift/storage-qe

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 9, 2025

@rhrmo: This pull request references STOR-2600 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/STOR-2600

/cc @openshift/storage
/cc @openshift/storage-qe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2025

@rhrmo: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: openshift/storage-qe, openshift/storage.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/STOR-2600

/cc @openshift/storage
/cc @openshift/storage-qe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

jsafrane commented Sep 9, 2025

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane, rhrmo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 9, 2025
@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 10, 2025

/hold I need to add update-metadata.sh to Makefile

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Sep 10, 2025
@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 10, 2025

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 10, 2025
Makefile Outdated
)

# Bump OCP version in CSV and OLM metadata
# Also updates the Makefile and README.md to the new version
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The script doesn't do this (in this PR) but it does in openshift/gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator#126 -- do you want to copy that logic here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually copying the logic wouldn't make sense in this repo, but can you update the comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh right, I will update the comment, thank you for noticing it slipped by me.

@rhrmo rhrmo changed the title STOR-2600: Bump OLM metadata to 4.21 STOR-2600, OCPBUGS-61436, OCPBUGS-61450: Bump OLM metadata to 4.21 Sep 11, 2025
@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 11, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 11, 2025

@rhrmo: This pull request references STOR-2600 which is a valid jira issue.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61436, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61450, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/STOR-2600

/cc @openshift/storage
/cc @openshift/storage-qe

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 11, 2025

@rhrmo: This pull request references STOR-2600 which is a valid jira issue.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61436, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61450, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rhrmo rhrmo force-pushed the update-metadata-4.21 branch from 2c8af72 to 139038b Compare September 11, 2025 09:09
@RomanBednar
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 11, 2025
@dobsonj
Copy link
Member

dobsonj commented Sep 11, 2025

/lgtm
/retest

@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 22, 2025

/retest

@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 23, 2025

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 23, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 23, 2025
@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 23, 2025

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 23, 2025
@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 23, 2025

/retest

Comment on lines +10 to +15
# OCP_VERSION is an optional argument. If no argument is provided, it defaults
# to the version found in .channels[0].currentCSV in PACKAGE_MANIFEST.
# This means you can run `./hack/update-metadata.sh` to update the manifests
# using the current package version, or you can for example run
# `./hack/update-metadata.sh 4.20` to set the package version to 4.20.
# Both PACKAGE_MANIFEST and CSV_MANIFEST will be updated by this script.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# OCP_VERSION is an optional argument. If no argument is provided, it defaults
# to the version found in .channels[0].currentCSV in PACKAGE_MANIFEST.
# This means you can run `./hack/update-metadata.sh` to update the manifests
# using the current package version, or you can for example run
# `./hack/update-metadata.sh 4.20` to set the package version to 4.20.
# Both PACKAGE_MANIFEST and CSV_MANIFEST will be updated by this script.
# OCP_VERSION is an optional argument.
#
# If no argument is provided, the script defaults to the version found in the
# '.channels[0].currentCSV' field of PACKAGE_MANIFEST. In this mode, only
# CSV_MANIFEST is updated. This means you can run './hack/update-metadata.sh'
# to update the manifest using the current package version.
#
# If you specify a version explicitly, for example './hack/update-metadata.sh 4.20',
# the script will set the package version to '4.20' in both PACKAGE_MANIFEST
# and CSV_MANIFEST.

@RomanBednar
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 23, 2025
@RomanBednar
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

2 similar comments
@radeore
Copy link

radeore commented Sep 25, 2025

/retest-required

@radeore
Copy link

radeore commented Sep 26, 2025

/retest-required

@radeore
Copy link

radeore commented Sep 26, 2025

/verified by CI runs

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@radeore: This PR has been marked as verified by [CI runs](https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_csi-operator/430/pull-ci-openshift-csi-operator-main-e2e-aws-csi/1971562637179228160).

In response to this:

/verified by CI runs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b52e702 and 2 for PR HEAD 7cdc4ca in total

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

2 similar comments
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Sep 30, 2025

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 12ef6e8 and 1 for PR HEAD 7cdc4ca in total

@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Oct 1, 2025

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@rhrmo
Copy link
Contributor Author

rhrmo commented Oct 6, 2025

/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 6, 2025

@rhrmo: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 7cdc4ca link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-csi 7cdc4ca link true /test e2e-azure-csi
ci/prow/e2e-azure-file-csi 7cdc4ca link true /test e2e-azure-file-csi
ci/prow/e2e-azure-file-nfs-csi 7cdc4ca link true /test e2e-azure-file-nfs-csi

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants