Skip to content

Fix the too strict checking of batch evaluator literals for multistart. #605

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

janosg
Copy link
Member

@janosg janosg commented Jun 16, 2025

Closes #604

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/optimagic/batch_evaluators.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/optimagic/deprecations.py 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/optimagic/differentiation/derivatives.py 96.18% <100.00%> (ø)
src/optimagic/differentiation/numdiff_options.py 98.48% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
src/optimagic/optimization/multistart_options.py 95.67% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
src/optimagic/optimizers/scipy_optimizers.py 96.80% <100.00%> (ø)
src/optimagic/typing.py 86.66% <100.00%> (ø)
src/optimagic/batch_evaluators.py 73.33% <60.00%> (-0.20%) ⬇️
src/optimagic/deprecations.py 99.07% <33.33%> (-0.93%) ⬇️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@janosg janosg requested a review from timmens June 16, 2025 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve checks for valid batch evaluators
2 participants