Add support for all vertical, well-quantized G4s that do not break the non-abelian gauge group

[HereAround]

cc @apturner @emikelsons

[lgoettgens]

Some random comments with small improvements to allocation reduction and type stability. There are many very similar opportunities to be improved that should be tackled at some point

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.01047% with 42 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.41%. Comparing base (a60b0d8) to head (c9639b2).
Report is 59 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...al/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/special_attributes.jl	75.15%	39 Missing ⚠️
.../FTheoryTools/src/AbstractFTheoryModels/methods.jl	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...rimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/constructors.jl	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4446      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.42%   84.41%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         668      668              
  Lines       88363    88598     +235     
==========================================
+ Hits        74600    74788     +188     
- Misses      13763    13810      +47     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...perimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/attributes.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...perimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/properties.jl	98.46% <100.00%> (+0.63%)	⬆️
...tal/FTheoryTools/src/HypersurfaceModels/methods.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../FTheoryTools/src/LiteratureModels/constructors.jl	95.08% <ø> (ø)
experimental/FTheoryTools/src/auxiliary.jl	76.00% <100.00%> (ø)
experimental/FTheoryTools/test/tate_models.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...rimental/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/constructors.jl	75.47% <83.33%> (+20.15%)	⬆️
.../FTheoryTools/src/AbstractFTheoryModels/methods.jl	78.00% <50.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
...al/FTheoryTools/src/G4Fluxes/special_attributes.jl	78.12% <75.15%> (-2.88%)	⬇️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

[HereAround]

Some random comments with small improvements to allocation reduction and type stability. There are many very similar opportunities to be improved that should be tackled at some point

Thank you. I have taken your points into account. Ideally, 4914e16 should improve the code efficiency. But I am certain that there is a LOT more that could be done - in a separate PR.

[HereAround]

With that being said @apturner and @emikelsons , this PR should be ready for review.

[HereAround]

I just took the liberty to push changes that hopefully will reduce the number of allocations in the computation of singular loci. A bit more tricky - postponed to the next PR: #4453

[HereAround]

@emikelsons Thank you for spotting all those mistakes. Great catches! I just tried to fix those. Let us see if the tests succeed.

[emikelsons]

Looks good.