-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
Add support for AsyncResource #1472
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Sebmaster
wants to merge
12
commits into
petkaantonov:master
from
Sebmaster:feature/node-async-resource
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eafbe96
Add support for AsyncResource
Sebmaster e34b196
Add hidden symbol property to identify reflectHandler
Sebmaster bc63603
fixup! allow node 8.1 and remove unnecessary checks
Sebmaster 37fec25
fixup! only allow node 9.3.0 and up
Sebmaster c2783d8
fixup! Add missing null guard
Sebmaster cca4109
fixup! rename domain param to context
Sebmaster 233188f
fixup! clean up tests
Sebmaster ce47539
Add config option to enable AsyncResource initialization
Sebmaster 93c4b84
fixup! namespace our resource name
Sebmaster 7c5483f
fixup! don't declare function in block
Sebmaster e7ecea0
Use runInAsyncScope to avoid deprecated methods
Sebmaster d35f938
fixup! remove use of deprecated fn alias
Sebmaster File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this stripped somehow in the browser build? E.g. will this expression make it into
js/browser/bluebird.js? If so, it might cause problems while bundling in apps using bluebird. Maybe we'd want to put this logic into a completely separate file that's "guarded" by a file-level browser override so it's excluded from bundling? E.g. something like this:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, see the
excludein the browserify instructions, require will just return an empty object in that case (and even that won't be executed due to the isNode check before).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, gotcha. It compiles to
_dereq_('async_hooks')which just never gets executed. 👍