Skip to content

Conversation

@CodeRoadSoftwares
Copy link

Add/Update/Remove

  • [✅] I have read the contributing guidelines
  • [✅] I agree to the Code of Conduct
  • [✅] I have followed the format prescribed in the contributing guidelines
  • [ ✅] (OPTIONAL) In your pull request message, add additional context on the interview process if necessary

@desjardinsalec
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds like white boarding to me.

@ulgens
Copy link

ulgens commented Feb 28, 2025

I'm not sure if the repo has a policy for that, but my understanding is that these submissions were made by candidates after their experience with the process. A company pushing itself without an external approval might not be the best approach.

@CodeRoadSoftwares
Copy link
Author

CodeRoadSoftwares commented Feb 28, 2025

I can't understand why a company can't push itself. Admins are there to check if the claims made are true or false.
If PR from a candidate is validity, we can tell our all employees to make PR's. Will that be fine?

And somebody saying "Sounds like white boarding to me". Really? I think Whiteboarding is Solving problems in front of the interviewer? Am I right?
I think you're misled by the post-challenge interview. That's just to check, if the candidate solved it himself and not outsourced it.

@ulgens
Copy link

ulgens commented Feb 28, 2025

Admins are there to check if the claims made are true or false.

Nope. An admin or moderator of this repo can't interview all companies in this doc and validate it. It's not possible, and it's not the expectation here.

Really? Do you really understand what whiteboarding is? Solving problems in front of the interviewer? Am I right?

Not sure this is the best tone while you are trying to advertise for your company.

@CodeRoadSoftwares
Copy link
Author

Ummm. Can we let the moderators decide?
And they don't have to interview all the companies to validate them, basic research should be enough.

@CodeRoadSoftwares
Copy link
Author

And somebody saying "Sounds like white boarding to me". Really? I think Whiteboarding is Solving problems in front of the interviewer? Am I right?
I think you're misled by the post-challenge interview. That's just to check, if the candidate solved it himself and not outsourced it.

Is the tone better now?

@ulgens
Copy link

ulgens commented Feb 28, 2025

Is the tone better now?

You may want to allow a social media manager or a dev rel person to handle this. I don't think what you are doing here is for the company's best interest.

Ummm. Can we let the moderators decide?

I'm not a maintainer of this repo, I'm just a user of it and I was trying to share a common understanding about the content. Of course a maintainer will decide about merging.

And they don't have to interview all the companies to validate them, basic research should be enough.

Again, these type of curations assume that the contents are curated by individuals, and adding them means a reference to good past experience. In other words, they're not simply indexes.

@CodeRoadSoftwares
Copy link
Author

I'm not a maintainer of this repo, I'm just a user of it and I was trying to share a common understanding about it. Of course a maintainer will decide about it.

And I was just trying to explain why and how your understanding may not be right.

@desjardinsalec
Copy link
Contributor

desjardinsalec commented Feb 28, 2025

My other GitHub account is a maintainer. "Fastest and optimized solutions" makes it seem like whiteboard coding challenges unrelated to real world problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants