Skip to content

gh-102555 Increase HTML standard compliance for closing comment tags #117406

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Lib/_markupbase.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@

_declname_match = re.compile(r'[a-zA-Z][-_.a-zA-Z0-9]*\s*').match
_declstringlit_match = re.compile(r'(\'[^\']*\'|"[^"]*")\s*').match
_commentclose = re.compile(r'--\s*>')
_commentclose = re.compile(r'--!?>')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would leave the \s*, even though I should double check what the HTML5 specs say exactly.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Privat33r-dev Privat33r-dev Apr 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would leave the \s*, even though I should double check what the HTML5 specs say exactly.

I provided the links to HTML5 specification earlier and "\s*" mentioned nowhere, moreover, my tests with latest versions of Firefox and Chrome has shown that it's in fact an incorrect behaviour and is not considered a closing tag by modern browsers. Thus I see no reason in keeping it (nor spec, nor common practice).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#comment-end-state is the section of the specs I was looking for. It does indeed mention the ! but not the spaces, so updating the code accordingly sounds good to me.

Do you want to add tests to check these (-->, --!>, -- >, --x>, --->, etc.) cases?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#comment-end-state is the section of the specs I was looking for. It does indeed mention the ! but not the spaces, so updating the code accordingly sounds good to me.

Do you want to add tests to check these (-->, --!>, -- >, --x>, --->, etc.) cases?

I am thinking about improving the solution to even include <!-->, unexpected EOF and similar other test cases (that were mentioned in a similar PR), but at the moment, unfortunately, I am lacking time to work on this PR. Hopefully, in the week (or at the weekend at worst) I can add the test cases and change a few other parts of the code to handle even wider variety of edge cases.

_markedsectionclose = re.compile(r']\s*]\s*>')

# An analysis of the MS-Word extensions is available at
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Follow the `parsing recommendation <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/parsing.html#parse-error-incorrectly-closed-comment>`_ and `standard <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#comments>`_ for closing comment tag in the :mod:`html.parser`. Increased compliance leads to predictable behavior, thus enhancing security.