Skip to content

Fix a trivial typo in a comment. #21508

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

ericvsmith
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 0275e04 into python:master Jul 16, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ericvsmith for the PR, and @pablogsal for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

@pablogsal
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the catch @ericvsmith !

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 0275e04)

Co-authored-by: Eric V. Smith <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-21510 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Jul 16, 2020
@ericvsmith
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the catch @ericvsmith !

Well, I probably wrote it! It's not the first time I've made this identical typo.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 0275e04)

Co-authored-by: Eric V. Smith <[email protected]>
arun-mani-j pushed a commit to arun-mani-j/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
shihai1991 pushed a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2020
shihai1991 pushed a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
xzy3 pushed a commit to xzy3/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants