Skip to content

[fbgemm_gpu] Include ITEP operators in OSS build #2700

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

q10
Copy link
Contributor

@q10 q10 commented Jun 7, 2024

  • Include ITEP operators in OSS build

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8d78e69
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-fbgemm-docs/deploys/666380f1fc998600088c0f8d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2700--pytorch-fbgemm-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@q10 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@q10 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D58299965

q10 added a commit to q10/FBGEMM that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Summary:
- Include ITEP operators in OSS build

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2700

Reviewed By: spcyppt

Differential Revision: D58299965

Pulled By: q10
Summary:
- Include ITEP operators in OSS build

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2700

Reviewed By: spcyppt

Differential Revision: D58299965

Pulled By: q10
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D58299965

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@q10 merged this pull request in 89e5612.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants