Skip to content

Change to optimize_for_target_gateset in docs #6658

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

dstrain115
Copy link
Collaborator

  • This doc had an incorrect name for the function. Changed to the correct one.

- This doc had an incorrect name for the function.
Changed to the correct one.
@dstrain115 dstrain115 requested review from vtomole, cduck and a team as code owners July 3, 2024 21:41
@dstrain115 dstrain115 requested a review from maffoo July 3, 2024 21:41
@CirqBot CirqBot added the Size: XS <10 lines changed label Jul 3, 2024
@dstrain115 dstrain115 requested a review from mpharrigan July 3, 2024 21:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.81%. Comparing base (da5c3b5) to head (d0b06eb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6658   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.81%   97.81%           
=======================================
  Files        1066     1066           
  Lines       91832    91832           
=======================================
  Hits        89826    89826           
  Misses       2006     2006           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dstrain115 dstrain115 merged commit 32d4833 into quantumlib:main Jul 3, 2024
34 checks passed
harry-phasecraft pushed a commit to PhaseCraft/Cirq that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
- This doc had an incorrect name for the function.
Changed to the correct one.
BichengYing pushed a commit to BichengYing/Cirq that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
- This doc had an incorrect name for the function.
Changed to the correct one.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Size: XS <10 lines changed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants