Skip to content

Move moment index into circuit message #7008

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

dstrain115
Copy link
Collaborator

  • This addresses design review comments that the moment_index should be outside the Moment message to be consistent and avoid a message construction.
  • This PR also simplifies the code to deserialize all the constants first, which removes the need for lookup tables and logic later.
  • In addition, this puts the deserialization of a moment into its own function.

- This addresses design review comments that the moment_index should
be outside the Moment message to be consistent and avoid a message
construction.
- This PR also simplifies the code to deserialize all the constants
first, which removes the need for lookup tables and logic later.
- In addition, this puts the deserialization of a moment into its
own function.
@dstrain115 dstrain115 requested review from wcourtney, vtomole, verult and a team as code owners January 30, 2025 23:35
@CirqBot CirqBot added the size: L 250< lines changed <1000 label Jan 30, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.89%. Comparing base (26b1f46) to head (ee28330).
Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7008      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.89%   97.89%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1085     1085              
  Lines       95131    95126       -5     
==========================================
- Hits        93124    93119       -5     
  Misses       2007     2007              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pavoljuhas pavoljuhas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a couple of small changes.

@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ def _serialize_circuit(
if self.use_constants_table_for_moments:
if moment_index := raw_constants.get(moment, None):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let us handle corner case when moment is at index 0.

Suggested change
if moment_index := raw_constants.get(moment, None):
if moment_index := raw_constants.get(moment, None) is not None:

same for the similar constructs at lines 112, 135.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call. Done.

@dstrain115 dstrain115 requested a review from pavoljuhas February 1, 2025 15:29
@dstrain115 dstrain115 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into quantumlib:main with commit 6c9db55 Feb 4, 2025
38 checks passed
@dstrain115 dstrain115 deleted the move_circuit_index_up branch February 4, 2025 17:52
BichengYing pushed a commit to BichengYing/Cirq that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
* Move moment index into circuit message

- This addresses design review comments that the moment_index should
be outside the Moment message to be consistent and avoid a message
construction.
- This PR also simplifies the code to deserialize all the constants
first, which removes the need for lookup tables and logic later.
- In addition, this puts the deserialization of a moment into its
own function.

* types

* typo]]]]

* Fix build protos to whatever version thing I was missing.

* Address review comments.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size: L 250< lines changed <1000
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants